IBJNews

Court approves $26M acquisition of Indiana Limestone

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Victor Oolitic Stone Co., which does business as Indiana Limestone Co., received court approval last week to sell its assets to Indiana Commercial Finance LLC in exchange for $26 million in secured debt.

ILC is the largest limestone quarry company and fabricator in North America, according to its website. Over the years it has supplied limestone for the construction of numerous landmark buildings, including the National Cathedral and 35 state capitol buildings.

The company and its 10 quarries filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection on Feb. 17 in Delaware.

The buyer, a subsidiary of suburban Chicago firm Wynnchurch Capital, bought $53 million in secured debt from ILC leading up to the bankruptcy.

Indiana Finance was approved in March as the stalking-horse, or lead, bidder for last week's auction. It was expected to set the minimum price for other potential buyers to beat, but no other bidders turned out. The sale went off on the schedule that the company proposed when entering bankruptcy.

In addition to bank debt, the Indiana Limestone owed $6 million to trade suppliers and some former owners. The petition shows the business as being worth more than $50 million.

ILC’s quarries cover 4,000 acres, containing a 100-year supply of limestone. The company was acquired from a prior bankruptcy in Indianapolis in 2009.

ILC notified state officials in February that it would lay off 166 workers from its Bloomington operations and Oolitic headquarters.

Indiana Limestone president Duffe Elkins said the business is expected to reopen and rehire workers after the new ownership takes charge.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT