IBJNews

Court rules Duke must cover ice storm costs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld state regulators' rejection of Duke Energy's bid to pass costs it incurred during a 2009 ice storm onto its customers.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission had found in 2010 that Duke Energy could pass onto ratepayers about $11 million in power-outage repair costs following a January 2009 ice storm. But the regulatory panel reversed that decision in 2011.

Duke Energy attorney Jon Laramore told the court during oral arguments this month that the panel's reversal was an "arbitrary and capricious action." He also said the IURC didn't explain how it reached two different conclusions based on the same evidence.

But the appeals court ruled Friday regulators didn't have to explain their different conclusion and said the evidence wasn't the same.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Greedy?
    seems that Duke wants to have a 100% profit margin huh? pass all expenses onto the customers, help out the executives w/ there bonus's i'm sure too.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT