IBJNews

Court rules Steak n Shake broke pact with ad agency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A District Court in Indiana this week ruled that Steak n Shake breached its contract with its former advertising agency, Georgia-based The Varnson Group.

Steak n Shake signed a $4.36 million, 26-month contract with Varnson in November 2008, but fired the firm less than three months later for undisclosed reasons. 

The two firms sued each other after the breakup, with Varnson claiming Steak n Shake failed to live up to the contract agreement and the restaurant chain claiming the now-defunct ad agency refused to return proprietary materials.

Steak n Shake signed a contract with Varnson on Nov. 1, 2008, that would pay the ad agency $178,333 per month, court documents said.

The contract stipulated that the deal could be cancelled by Steak n Shake at any time, but that the agreement would continue for 90 days after the Indianapolis-based restaurant chain gave termination notice to Varnson officials.

Attorneys for Varnson contended that the contract stipulated that the ad firm would be paid through the entirety of that 90-day period and that Steak n Shake failed to render that payment after it terminated the deal in February 2009.

“We find entirely unconvincing Steak n Shake’s attempt to argue that Varnson earned only that portion of the monthly Scope of Service fee that corresponded with the services performed during that particular month,” the court ruling stated.

The summary judgment issued this week did not stipulate the amount of damages that would be awarded to Varnson. That amount must be determined by a trial unless the two sides settle.

If the court ruling finds Varnson must be paid the full amount for the entire 90-day period, Steak n Shake could have to cough up more than $500,000 for damages and legal fees.

However, if the case does go to trial, Varnson could be found liable for not returning Steak n Shake marketing materials in a timely manner after the contract was terminated. But damages for that offense are likely to be no more than $7,750.

Money paid to Varnson isn't likely to go into the pockets of principals of the agency, which declared bankruptcy and went out of business in the year after Steak n Shake pulled its business. Most or all of the damages, said Varnson representatives, would go to settle its outstanding debt.

If the case goes to trial, that wouldn’t likely be until the first half of next year, said Peter S. Kovacs, an attorney in the Indianapolis office of Stewart & Irwin, who was appointed by a bankruptcy court in Georgia to represent the Varnson Group trust.

Attorneys representing Steak n Shake could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning.

“It’s impossible to say if this case will be settled, but most cases like this do get settled,” Kovacs said. “So, I wouldn’t be surprised if the court directed the two sides to get together and try to hammer out a settlement.

Steak n Shake signed an $18 million advertising contract with New York-based Kirshenbaum Bond Senecal & Partners early last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT