IBJNews

Court rules Steak n Shake broke pact with ad agency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A District Court in Indiana this week ruled that Steak n Shake breached its contract with its former advertising agency, Georgia-based The Varnson Group.

Steak n Shake signed a $4.36 million, 26-month contract with Varnson in November 2008, but fired the firm less than three months later for undisclosed reasons. 

The two firms sued each other after the breakup, with Varnson claiming Steak n Shake failed to live up to the contract agreement and the restaurant chain claiming the now-defunct ad agency refused to return proprietary materials.

Steak n Shake signed a contract with Varnson on Nov. 1, 2008, that would pay the ad agency $178,333 per month, court documents said.

The contract stipulated that the deal could be cancelled by Steak n Shake at any time, but that the agreement would continue for 90 days after the Indianapolis-based restaurant chain gave termination notice to Varnson officials.

Attorneys for Varnson contended that the contract stipulated that the ad firm would be paid through the entirety of that 90-day period and that Steak n Shake failed to render that payment after it terminated the deal in February 2009.

“We find entirely unconvincing Steak n Shake’s attempt to argue that Varnson earned only that portion of the monthly Scope of Service fee that corresponded with the services performed during that particular month,” the court ruling stated.

The summary judgment issued this week did not stipulate the amount of damages that would be awarded to Varnson. That amount must be determined by a trial unless the two sides settle.

If the court ruling finds Varnson must be paid the full amount for the entire 90-day period, Steak n Shake could have to cough up more than $500,000 for damages and legal fees.

However, if the case does go to trial, Varnson could be found liable for not returning Steak n Shake marketing materials in a timely manner after the contract was terminated. But damages for that offense are likely to be no more than $7,750.

Money paid to Varnson isn't likely to go into the pockets of principals of the agency, which declared bankruptcy and went out of business in the year after Steak n Shake pulled its business. Most or all of the damages, said Varnson representatives, would go to settle its outstanding debt.

If the case goes to trial, that wouldn’t likely be until the first half of next year, said Peter S. Kovacs, an attorney in the Indianapolis office of Stewart & Irwin, who was appointed by a bankruptcy court in Georgia to represent the Varnson Group trust.

Attorneys representing Steak n Shake could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning.

“It’s impossible to say if this case will be settled, but most cases like this do get settled,” Kovacs said. “So, I wouldn’t be surprised if the court directed the two sides to get together and try to hammer out a settlement.

Steak n Shake signed an $18 million advertising contract with New York-based Kirshenbaum Bond Senecal & Partners early last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!

ADVERTISEMENT