IBJNews

Court rules Steak n Shake broke pact with ad agency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A District Court in Indiana this week ruled that Steak n Shake breached its contract with its former advertising agency, Georgia-based The Varnson Group.

Steak n Shake signed a $4.36 million, 26-month contract with Varnson in November 2008, but fired the firm less than three months later for undisclosed reasons. 

The two firms sued each other after the breakup, with Varnson claiming Steak n Shake failed to live up to the contract agreement and the restaurant chain claiming the now-defunct ad agency refused to return proprietary materials.

Steak n Shake signed a contract with Varnson on Nov. 1, 2008, that would pay the ad agency $178,333 per month, court documents said.

The contract stipulated that the deal could be cancelled by Steak n Shake at any time, but that the agreement would continue for 90 days after the Indianapolis-based restaurant chain gave termination notice to Varnson officials.

Attorneys for Varnson contended that the contract stipulated that the ad firm would be paid through the entirety of that 90-day period and that Steak n Shake failed to render that payment after it terminated the deal in February 2009.

“We find entirely unconvincing Steak n Shake’s attempt to argue that Varnson earned only that portion of the monthly Scope of Service fee that corresponded with the services performed during that particular month,” the court ruling stated.

The summary judgment issued this week did not stipulate the amount of damages that would be awarded to Varnson. That amount must be determined by a trial unless the two sides settle.

If the court ruling finds Varnson must be paid the full amount for the entire 90-day period, Steak n Shake could have to cough up more than $500,000 for damages and legal fees.

However, if the case does go to trial, Varnson could be found liable for not returning Steak n Shake marketing materials in a timely manner after the contract was terminated. But damages for that offense are likely to be no more than $7,750.

Money paid to Varnson isn't likely to go into the pockets of principals of the agency, which declared bankruptcy and went out of business in the year after Steak n Shake pulled its business. Most or all of the damages, said Varnson representatives, would go to settle its outstanding debt.

If the case goes to trial, that wouldn’t likely be until the first half of next year, said Peter S. Kovacs, an attorney in the Indianapolis office of Stewart & Irwin, who was appointed by a bankruptcy court in Georgia to represent the Varnson Group trust.

Attorneys representing Steak n Shake could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning.

“It’s impossible to say if this case will be settled, but most cases like this do get settled,” Kovacs said. “So, I wouldn’t be surprised if the court directed the two sides to get together and try to hammer out a settlement.

Steak n Shake signed an $18 million advertising contract with New York-based Kirshenbaum Bond Senecal & Partners early last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT