IBJNews

Court upholds former pastor's fraud sentence

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld a 54-year sentence for a 67-year-old former pastor convicted of pocketing millions of dollars that investors believed would be used to build churches.

The court denied Vaughn Reeves' appeal Monday. He was convicted in October of nine counts of securities fraud.

Reeves had argued his sentence was too harsh. But the three-judge panel noted that Special Judge Dena Martin found Reeves defrauded about 2,900 people of more than $13 million, and that many of those people lost their entire retirement savings.

Reeves' three sons also were convicted on securities fraud charges involving the family's shuttered Sullivan-based church-bond company, Alanar.

Among aggravating factors, Martin also found Reeves targeted people over age 65 and used religion to influence them.

Alanar used a modified Ponzi scheme in which it diverted investors' money from building projects to speculative investments and to interest payments on other bonds, according to the Indiana Secretary of State's Office, whose Securities Division assisted prosecutors in the case.

Alanar encouraged church members to sell the bonds to fellow congregants using sales pitches that included prayers and Bible passages.

"Never sell the facts, sell warm stewardship and the Lord," Alanar training materials said.

Reeves' attorney's office did not answer phone calls seeking comment about thr appeal.

Reeves' sons, Joshua, Chris and Chip, reached plea bargains and received sentences ranging from six to 24 years.

The four men were arrested in mid-2009.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not a high interest
    Yes the company that took over salvaged and redid some mortgages and for that effort they were kinda rewarded. I assure you that from what I knew of the situation they had better things to do than taking this bag of worms over. There were indeed mortgages that were lost as well as people losing their life savings. I listen to preachers and politicians with one eye on them and the other on my billfold. I DO NOT TRUST EITHER OF THEM.
  • I was there.
    I was a Trustee for our church and rather than go to a BANK (THIEF) and have 18 members put up all of their homes as collateral as personal co-signers/guarentors I found Alanar and even drove down and met Vaughn. I spent a good deal of time doing my due diligence and still got our church caught in their fraud. As long as the church continued to pay the mortgage to the trustees people got their money back, no Intersted as promised. I felt fortunate to not lose everything. I am not sure they got enough time in Jail if they are even there.

    Buyer beware was not even a good indicator of the problem. My only concern that I voiced was there were waaaaaay too many relatives with conflicts of interest. Lesson learned.
  • who, where?
    i realize they used 5 to 6 million dollars for their own gain. the question is " who took control of the mortgages and what did they pay for the church mortgages?" pennies on the dollar for high interest mortgages. where is the crime? there was over 200 million in mortgages.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

    2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

    3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

    4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

    5. David Copperfield!

    ADVERTISEMENT