Court upholds former pastor's fraud sentence

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld a 54-year sentence for a 67-year-old former pastor convicted of pocketing millions of dollars that investors believed would be used to build churches.

The court denied Vaughn Reeves' appeal Monday. He was convicted in October of nine counts of securities fraud.

Reeves had argued his sentence was too harsh. But the three-judge panel noted that Special Judge Dena Martin found Reeves defrauded about 2,900 people of more than $13 million, and that many of those people lost their entire retirement savings.

Reeves' three sons also were convicted on securities fraud charges involving the family's shuttered Sullivan-based church-bond company, Alanar.

Among aggravating factors, Martin also found Reeves targeted people over age 65 and used religion to influence them.

Alanar used a modified Ponzi scheme in which it diverted investors' money from building projects to speculative investments and to interest payments on other bonds, according to the Indiana Secretary of State's Office, whose Securities Division assisted prosecutors in the case.

Alanar encouraged church members to sell the bonds to fellow congregants using sales pitches that included prayers and Bible passages.

"Never sell the facts, sell warm stewardship and the Lord," Alanar training materials said.

Reeves' attorney's office did not answer phone calls seeking comment about thr appeal.

Reeves' sons, Joshua, Chris and Chip, reached plea bargains and received sentences ranging from six to 24 years.

The four men were arrested in mid-2009.


  • Not a high interest
    Yes the company that took over salvaged and redid some mortgages and for that effort they were kinda rewarded. I assure you that from what I knew of the situation they had better things to do than taking this bag of worms over. There were indeed mortgages that were lost as well as people losing their life savings. I listen to preachers and politicians with one eye on them and the other on my billfold. I DO NOT TRUST EITHER OF THEM.
  • I was there.
    I was a Trustee for our church and rather than go to a BANK (THIEF) and have 18 members put up all of their homes as collateral as personal co-signers/guarentors I found Alanar and even drove down and met Vaughn. I spent a good deal of time doing my due diligence and still got our church caught in their fraud. As long as the church continued to pay the mortgage to the trustees people got their money back, no Intersted as promised. I felt fortunate to not lose everything. I am not sure they got enough time in Jail if they are even there.

    Buyer beware was not even a good indicator of the problem. My only concern that I voiced was there were waaaaaay too many relatives with conflicts of interest. Lesson learned.
  • who, where?
    i realize they used 5 to 6 million dollars for their own gain. the question is " who took control of the mortgages and what did they pay for the church mortgages?" pennies on the dollar for high interest mortgages. where is the crime? there was over 200 million in mortgages.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

    2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

    3. Straight No Chaser

    4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

    5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.