IBJNews

Court upholds Lilly patent on cancer drug Alimta

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Eli Lily and Co. said a federal court judge has upheld a patent protecting one of its best-selling drugs, the cancer treatment Alimta.

A trial on the drug's compound patent, which protects its chemical makeup, started Nov. 8 and ended Monday with a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Lilly said. Generic drugmaker Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. had challenged the patent, which protects Alimta until July 2016.

Alimita was Lilly's third-best-selling drug in the third quarter, trailing only the antipsychotic Zyprexa and the antidepressant Cymbalta. Revenue from Alimta climbed 21 percent, to $560.3 million, in the quarter, as sales in Japan rose. Alimta rang up $1.64 billion in sales during the first three quarters of 2010.

It was a welcome court win after a difficult few months for Lilly, which is facing a wave of patent expirations in coming years.

In August, a federal judge in New Jersey ruled that the company's method-of-use patent for attention deficit hyperactivity drug Strattera is invalid; Lilly is appealing that decision.  The previous month, a federal appeals court upheld a ruling that invalidated a patent on cancer drug Gemzar, which generates $750 million in U.S. sales each year.

A generic version of Gemzar launched Monday.

Gemzar is the first of several blockbuster Lilly drugs that will see their patents expire by 2013. Generic versions of Zyprexa, Cymbalta, Evista and Strattera could zap nearly half of Lilly's current sales, putting great pressure on the company to find new drugs to take their place.

Alimta is a chemotherapy drug used to treat advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma, a cancer that affects the inside lining of the chest cavity.

Lilly said last month its third-quarter profit jumped 38 percent to $1.3 billion, as international sales climbed. But, aside from court challenges, the company also faces patent expirations for some of its key products. That includes Zyprexa next year and Cymbalta in 2013.

Analysts who follow Lilly question how it will make up for the lost revenue. Company leaders have repeatedly expressed confidence in their pipeline of drugs under development, and they also point to growth opportunities in the animal health business and emerging international markets.

 

 

 


 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT