IBJNews

Court upholds Lilly patent on cancer drug Alimta

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Eli Lily and Co. said a federal court judge has upheld a patent protecting one of its best-selling drugs, the cancer treatment Alimta.

A trial on the drug's compound patent, which protects its chemical makeup, started Nov. 8 and ended Monday with a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Lilly said. Generic drugmaker Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. had challenged the patent, which protects Alimta until July 2016.

Alimita was Lilly's third-best-selling drug in the third quarter, trailing only the antipsychotic Zyprexa and the antidepressant Cymbalta. Revenue from Alimta climbed 21 percent, to $560.3 million, in the quarter, as sales in Japan rose. Alimta rang up $1.64 billion in sales during the first three quarters of 2010.

It was a welcome court win after a difficult few months for Lilly, which is facing a wave of patent expirations in coming years.

In August, a federal judge in New Jersey ruled that the company's method-of-use patent for attention deficit hyperactivity drug Strattera is invalid; Lilly is appealing that decision.  The previous month, a federal appeals court upheld a ruling that invalidated a patent on cancer drug Gemzar, which generates $750 million in U.S. sales each year.

A generic version of Gemzar launched Monday.

Gemzar is the first of several blockbuster Lilly drugs that will see their patents expire by 2013. Generic versions of Zyprexa, Cymbalta, Evista and Strattera could zap nearly half of Lilly's current sales, putting great pressure on the company to find new drugs to take their place.

Alimta is a chemotherapy drug used to treat advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma, a cancer that affects the inside lining of the chest cavity.

Lilly said last month its third-quarter profit jumped 38 percent to $1.3 billion, as international sales climbed. But, aside from court challenges, the company also faces patent expirations for some of its key products. That includes Zyprexa next year and Cymbalta in 2013.

Analysts who follow Lilly question how it will make up for the lost revenue. Company leaders have repeatedly expressed confidence in their pipeline of drugs under development, and they also point to growth opportunities in the animal health business and emerging international markets.

 

 

 


 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT