IBJNews

Critics knock school superintendent pay-cap idea

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The suggestion that Indiana lawmakers impose a limit on the pay for school district superintendents doesn't seem to have much support.

A legislative committee studying the issue heard Thursday from state and local education officials who panned the idea, but the lawmaker who wanted the proposal reviewed didn't attend the meeting and no one spoke in favor of the cap.

Dennis Brooks, a senior adviser to state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, told the panel that it should be up to individual school boards to decide the value of their superintendents and what they ought to be paid.

Brooks called that a "free-market approach."

"While the state should continue to encourage strong leadership and oversight for school corporations in compensation, capping superintendent salaries, we believe, would inhibit locals' ability to compete and provide their schools the leadership they need to be successful," said Brooks, a former superintendent in Floyd County.

Superintendent pay came under scrutiny after the head of the Wayne Township district in suburban Indianapolis received a retirement package worth more than $1 million.

State Department of Education figures show that Indiana's 291 superintendents have salaries ranging from $29,400 to $262,800, with the average at $113,162, The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne reported.

Only one state was mentioned during Thursday's meeting as having such a pay cap. New Jersey this year limited pay based on district enrollment so that only superintendents in districts with more than 10,000 students can earn more than the governor's salary of $175,000.

As a result, some superintendents in that state are stepping down to avoid large pay cuts.

"To do a blanket statement and say every superintendent in the state should be treated the same when every community is different ... would be wrong," Chris Himsel, superintendent of Northwest Allen County Schools, told the Indiana committee.

Lawmakers on the panel said they weren't interested in taking away local school boards' control over administrative pay.

"Any attempts to set a salary schedule for superintendents statewide would inhibit our competitive edge. Each school community has something that's unique that needs to be addressed locally," said Rep. Wendy McNamara, R-Mount Vernon.

Sen. Jim Banks, R-Columbia City, sponsored the motion for the superintendent pay study and said the scrutiny on pay for school administrators is positive.

"What matters most is we're drawing attention to the issue so that elected school board members around the state know that the public's paying attention," Banks told the Evansville Courier & Press.

Banks said he didn't expect to sponsor a bill calling for a pay cap during the next legislative session that starts in January.

Instead, he said, he will likely propose a requirement that school districts spend 65 percent of their state funding on "in the classroom" expenses excluding administrator pay.

"Every dollar that we spend raising a superintendent's salary is less money that we spend on teachers and on students in the classroom," Banks said.

House Education Committee chairman Robert Behning, R-Indianapolis, told WISH-TV he believed taxpayers should be able to easily know a superintendent's compensation, including benefits, travel allowances and retirement payments.

"A bottom-line compensation number is what the public needs to have access to," Behning said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What's goof for the gander
    In a state where the very thought of a classroom teacher receiving competitive pay brought, not only hysterical howls, but politically motivated "sweeping" legislation, the hypocrisy is despicable.

    It's apparent that our current one-party government is quite happy to not only tolerate, but actually defend the squandering of resources they've made increasingly smaller for public education. I suppose if superintendent organizations financially supported Democrats, there might be meaningful reform aimed at the lavishly recompensed policy makers as opposed to those who are simply charged with enduring these awful fads and gimmicks.

    How could any rational citizen not notice, let alone recoil from such behavior?
  • Look it up
    Rep. Behning - if he's going to be the Education Committee Chairman -- needs to brush up on his public records law...a superintendent's salary is a public record and it can easily be found. He just needs to look and while he's at it, he is well advised to focus on more important education issues and maybe work with educators on issues that help our kids instead of posturing and being misinformed.
  • Get it right
    As Alan correctly noted, it is WAYNE TOWNSHIP and their band of out-of-touch board members who signed off on the "Terry Thompson Superintendent Emeritus" prize package.

    A correction would be nice, but probably too much to expect.
  • Wrong Again
    It was MSD of Wayne Township that was under investigation, Warren Township. Get your facts straight.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

    2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

    3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

    4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

    5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

    ADVERTISEMENT