IBJNews

Critics say grades for schools too complex to understand

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Public schools around Indiana will learn their final grades next week under a ranking system using new rules that critics say are too complex for schools and parents to understand.

The State Board of Education is scheduled to approve grades for the more than 2,000 public schools across the state on Wednesday. The system, based largely on student standardized test scores, gives schools and districts A-F grades instead of ranking them by categories such as "academic progress" and "probation" as had been done until 2011.

But this year, the grades are based on new rules that critics claim are inaccurate and unfair. The state board approved the new rules in February over widespread opposition ranging from teachers to the Indiana Chamber of Commerce.

Much of the criticism revolves around the way the new evaluation system measures student growth. Students only get credit for "high growth" if their gain is better than two-thirds of all students at their testing level. That means only a third of students will be able to reach it, no matter how much their scores go up.

Supporters, including state schools Superintendent Tony Bennett, say the new way gives schools more credit when students' test scores grow faster than their peers, and provides more information and greater flexibility than the old system.

"It used to be strictly on a pass-fail system, and that's no longer the case," Bennett, who is running for his second term, told The Associated Press in an interview this week.

Bennett's opponent, Glenda Ritz, has made an issue out of the new evaluation system, saying the rules are so complicated even Bennett's own department doesn't understand them.

Last year, the grades were released in August. They were supposed to be released Oct. 10 this year, but that was delayed until Oct. 31 after the Department of Education was bombarded with questions and several school districts filed appeals, The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne reported.

Bennett said the agency wanted to give schools and districts more time to examine the preliminary results they received in September.

"My No. 1 goal was to get it right and to provide a clear picture of how schools perform," he told AP.

Ritz, however, said she suspects the grades' release to be delayed again—until after Nov. 6.

"I don't think Tony is going to release the results until after the election, because most schools are going to receive D's and F's," she said.

The grades will reflect schools' performances during the 2011-12 school year.

East Allen County Schools Superintendent Karyle Green told The Journal Gazette that the calculations used in the new system are so difficult to fathom they cause people to lose confidence in the results. She also questioned the way student growth is measured.

"The ideas behind what they're trying to do have positive merit, but because it's so new, nothing appears to be going as planned," she said.

Green also questioned how schools could usefully apply the grades when they aren't released until months into the school year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • School grades and the election
    It really will be interesting to see if the school grades are released before the election! Ultimately the grades of schools in Indiana are the grades of Dr. Bennett himself.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT