IBJNews

Crossroads Classic pleases fans, but long-term future uncertain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The two-year trial of the Crossroads Classic doubleheader college basketball event is receiving positive reviews from fans statewide, especially after nail-biting games like Saturday's overtime contest between the Indiana Hoosiers and Butler Bulldogs.

Earlier this year, the four participating universities—IU, Purdue, Notre Dame and Butler—agreed to a two-year extension to hold the event through 2014 at Bankers Life Fieldhouse in downtown Indianapolis.

But there are still scheduling concerns to be worked out if the fledgling event is to become a long-term college basketball tradition.

Butler, for instance, is in its first year in the Atlantic 10 Conference, and its future in the league is less than certain. A new conference still in the formative stages that  includes seven Big East schools reportedly is considering inviting Butler to join, and it is uncertain what these changes will mean to the school’s non-conference schedule.
 
The expansion of the Big Ten Conference, of which IU and Purdue are members, could affect those schools’ non-conference schedules and their availability for future Crossroads Classics.

Officials for Notre Dame said scheduling challenges have little to do with its non-conference schedule or its leap from the Big East to the Atlantic Coast Conference.

“Some years, it could become tricky with final [exams],” said Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick. “It’s more an issue with our academic schedule than our athletic schedule.”

While Swarbrick said Notre Dame is committed to making the event work, he said thinking too long-term is difficult.

“As volatile as the college athletics landscape is right now, it’s difficult to look too far out,” he said. “Two-year timelines in college athletics right now are long ones.”

Challenges aside, Swarbrick said the event has become “a great celebration of basketball in the state of Indiana,” and he’s hopeful it can continue beyond 2014.

“Everything about this event has been positive,” he said.

That doesn’t mean it doesn’t need tweaking. One needed change, Swarbrick said, is that IU needs to play in the second game of the doubleheader.

“That’s one thing we learned this year,” Swarbrick said.

After Butler nipped IU in overtime of Saturday’s doubleheader, several thousand people left the fieldhouse before or during the early part of Notre Dame's victory over Purdue.

“More often than not, Indiana’s going to have the biggest following,” Swarbrick said.

Purdue Athletic Director Morgan Burke, who is credited for starting the event, said he's hopeful the doubleheader can become “a holiday tradition,” but said it needs to be re-evaluated on an annual basis.

“The feedback from our student-athletes, coaching staff and fans has been positive, and we think this is great event,” Burke said. “We will critique the event as we did last year ... to see what we can do to improve and what we want to ensure we maintain.”

Unlike many NCAA Division I college basketball events, the Crossroads Classic is not organized by a third party. Instead, the four participating schools decided to rotate hosting duties and evenly split expenses and revenue. Pacers Sports & Entertainment oversees operations at Bankers Life Fieldhouse for the event.

A sellout crowd of more than 18,500 fans witnessed the inaugural Crossroads Classic in 2011, as Butler defeated Purdue and IU beat Notre Dame. This year’s Classic also was a sellout.

Next year’s doubleheader is scheduled for Dec. 14.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ben is Right
    Love the idea. Hoosier Hardwood Classic. 8 teams, along with some sort of scheme that gets each three games.
  • 8 teams
    I'm on board with Ben. But why not take the top 8 Hoosier schools from the previous year and do a three - day mini tournament. Have loser brackets and everything. Would be awesome.
  • Border Wars
    Instead of rotating ND vs. IU and IU vs. Butler every year since the IU and Purdue matchup outside of the Big Ten will never happen, why not start a Midwest "border war" match up between the present 4 Indiana universities against perhaps Ohio universities (OSU, Cincy, Ohio) or Kentucky universities (UK, Louisville, WKU, etc) aand rotate sites between the two states that are chosen in order to avoid constant scheduling headaches with annual events at Bankers Life or elsewhere. This way, big match ups such as IU v. Cincy or ND v. OSU or Butler v. Kentucky depending on the drawing would draw a larger Midwest as well as National base. This seems to be a "Big Ten-ACC" gimmicky challenge redone, but maybe some more variety to just rotating two opponents each year would make this a more interesting draw?
  • Other options
    I know it would not be the same caliber but what about bringing in Ball St, Indiana St, Evansville, IPFW or IUPUI? Hoosiers love their basketball and this would give the mid-majors a chance to show off.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT