IBJNews

Crossroads Classic pleases fans, but long-term future uncertain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The two-year trial of the Crossroads Classic doubleheader college basketball event is receiving positive reviews from fans statewide, especially after nail-biting games like Saturday's overtime contest between the Indiana Hoosiers and Butler Bulldogs.

Earlier this year, the four participating universities—IU, Purdue, Notre Dame and Butler—agreed to a two-year extension to hold the event through 2014 at Bankers Life Fieldhouse in downtown Indianapolis.

But there are still scheduling concerns to be worked out if the fledgling event is to become a long-term college basketball tradition.

Butler, for instance, is in its first year in the Atlantic 10 Conference, and its future in the league is less than certain. A new conference still in the formative stages that  includes seven Big East schools reportedly is considering inviting Butler to join, and it is uncertain what these changes will mean to the school’s non-conference schedule.
 
The expansion of the Big Ten Conference, of which IU and Purdue are members, could affect those schools’ non-conference schedules and their availability for future Crossroads Classics.

Officials for Notre Dame said scheduling challenges have little to do with its non-conference schedule or its leap from the Big East to the Atlantic Coast Conference.

“Some years, it could become tricky with final [exams],” said Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick. “It’s more an issue with our academic schedule than our athletic schedule.”

While Swarbrick said Notre Dame is committed to making the event work, he said thinking too long-term is difficult.

“As volatile as the college athletics landscape is right now, it’s difficult to look too far out,” he said. “Two-year timelines in college athletics right now are long ones.”

Challenges aside, Swarbrick said the event has become “a great celebration of basketball in the state of Indiana,” and he’s hopeful it can continue beyond 2014.

“Everything about this event has been positive,” he said.

That doesn’t mean it doesn’t need tweaking. One needed change, Swarbrick said, is that IU needs to play in the second game of the doubleheader.

“That’s one thing we learned this year,” Swarbrick said.

After Butler nipped IU in overtime of Saturday’s doubleheader, several thousand people left the fieldhouse before or during the early part of Notre Dame's victory over Purdue.

“More often than not, Indiana’s going to have the biggest following,” Swarbrick said.

Purdue Athletic Director Morgan Burke, who is credited for starting the event, said he's hopeful the doubleheader can become “a holiday tradition,” but said it needs to be re-evaluated on an annual basis.

“The feedback from our student-athletes, coaching staff and fans has been positive, and we think this is great event,” Burke said. “We will critique the event as we did last year ... to see what we can do to improve and what we want to ensure we maintain.”

Unlike many NCAA Division I college basketball events, the Crossroads Classic is not organized by a third party. Instead, the four participating schools decided to rotate hosting duties and evenly split expenses and revenue. Pacers Sports & Entertainment oversees operations at Bankers Life Fieldhouse for the event.

A sellout crowd of more than 18,500 fans witnessed the inaugural Crossroads Classic in 2011, as Butler defeated Purdue and IU beat Notre Dame. This year’s Classic also was a sellout.

Next year’s doubleheader is scheduled for Dec. 14.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ben is Right
    Love the idea. Hoosier Hardwood Classic. 8 teams, along with some sort of scheme that gets each three games.
  • 8 teams
    I'm on board with Ben. But why not take the top 8 Hoosier schools from the previous year and do a three - day mini tournament. Have loser brackets and everything. Would be awesome.
  • Border Wars
    Instead of rotating ND vs. IU and IU vs. Butler every year since the IU and Purdue matchup outside of the Big Ten will never happen, why not start a Midwest "border war" match up between the present 4 Indiana universities against perhaps Ohio universities (OSU, Cincy, Ohio) or Kentucky universities (UK, Louisville, WKU, etc) aand rotate sites between the two states that are chosen in order to avoid constant scheduling headaches with annual events at Bankers Life or elsewhere. This way, big match ups such as IU v. Cincy or ND v. OSU or Butler v. Kentucky depending on the drawing would draw a larger Midwest as well as National base. This seems to be a "Big Ten-ACC" gimmicky challenge redone, but maybe some more variety to just rotating two opponents each year would make this a more interesting draw?
  • Other options
    I know it would not be the same caliber but what about bringing in Ball St, Indiana St, Evansville, IPFW or IUPUI? Hoosiers love their basketball and this would give the mid-majors a chance to show off.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT