IBJNews

Cummins Inc. profit soars on huge growth in sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Cummins Inc. reported a 60-percent increase in third-quarter profit as revenue soared 36 percent over the same quarter a year ago.

The Columbus-based engine maker said Tuesday morning that profit hit $452 million, or $2.35 per share, in the quarter ended Sept. 30, compared with $283 million, or $1.44 per diluted share, a year ago.

Third-quarter sales were $4.6 billion, up 36 percent from the same period last year. The company said it saw double-digit sales growth in all product segments.

"We delivered strong performance in the third quarter, and 2011 will be a record year for the company,"  Tom Linebarger, Cummins president and chief operating officer, said in a prepared statement before markets opened Tuesday.

While many key markets are showing strong growth, Linebarger acknowledged uncertainty in the global economy. The company dialed back its full-year revenue forecast to a range of $17.5 billion to $18 billion, which would be a 30-percent increase over 2010.

Government actions to reduce inflation in India and China have resulted in softer near-term demand than we previously expected, Linebarger said.

Cummin shares sank as much as 8.4 percent, to $90.50 per share, in mid-morning trading before rebounding more than 3 percent.

Cummins said it saw strong growth in several product categories, including global mining; oil and gas markets; trucking in North America and Brazil; and construction in Asia.

Segment sales were up across the board:

— Engine sales were $2.96 billion, up 43 percent from a year ago.

— Power Generation had sales of $874 million, a year-over-year increase of 10 percent.

— Components sales of $1.02 billion were up 32 percent year-over-year.

— Distribution sales were $783 million, an increase of 37 percent from a year ago.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. To get a pay raise, the teacher must score a "4" on a rubric that only has a "4' as the highest score. therefore all the administrator has to do is mark you a '3" in one area and no pay raise. My wife's evaluation "interestingly" now is lower than the last three years and no pay raise. My brother teaches around Indy where all of a sudden the highest score is 3.25 ie frozen pay raises.This is a faulty scoring system when a teacher would have to score perfect in all categories.Meanwhile, the administrators all got pay raises and two more were hired.It will be interesting to see what the administrators spouses score.
    The state needs a scoring system the rewards an effective teacher not a perfect teacher. I taught bfor 40 years and never used a scoring system that required perfection to reward my top students

  2. 'Floundering' would seem to indicate the sport is not long for the world. Sixteen years seems like a long time to 'flounder.'

    When one looks objectively at the metrics that matter; e.g., sponsorship, attendance an ratings, all are up.

    Is this another of those silly hater deals where you hold the sport of today up against the sport of twenty years ago then try some cutesy, childlike comparison to validate your little straw man?

    Here's another question: What is the specific purpose of television ratings?

  3. It will be really nice having another parking garage across the street from the two already on Illinois's east side. And there is another huge one just north of Michigan. If we fill in the surface lot north of Vermont and tear down that ridiculously old fashioned Rink Building we can achieve something few other municipalities can boast of: a 3 full city block canyon of parking garages.

    Plus, if there is a building downtown that merits imitation it is the One America tower. I propose it be the standard for all future design. And I propose we change our city name to Dystopolis.

  4. What is it on it's way back from? Pick one, let's discuss:

    - All oval series = FAILURE
    - Control AOW, Kill Sport = SUCCESS
    - Quality Field versus Quantity Field = FAILURE
    - Driver Death/Poor Chassis Design = FAILURE
    - More American/Less Foreign Drivers = FAILURE
    - More Street Courses/Less Ovals = SUCCESS
    - Merger/Asset Aquire with CCWS = SUCCESS
    - Penske wins all the time = SUCCESS
    - LOTUS barely is 3rd Manufacturer = FAILURE
    - Less Major Network TV/More Obscure TV = SUCCESS
    - Traditions Sacrificed for Survival = SUCCESS

    These are just a few topics....how is Indy on it's way back up?

  5. Chicken in a Biscuit

ADVERTISEMENT