IBJNews

Cummins Inc. profit soars on huge growth in sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Cummins Inc. reported a 60-percent increase in third-quarter profit as revenue soared 36 percent over the same quarter a year ago.

The Columbus-based engine maker said Tuesday morning that profit hit $452 million, or $2.35 per share, in the quarter ended Sept. 30, compared with $283 million, or $1.44 per diluted share, a year ago.

Third-quarter sales were $4.6 billion, up 36 percent from the same period last year. The company said it saw double-digit sales growth in all product segments.

"We delivered strong performance in the third quarter, and 2011 will be a record year for the company,"  Tom Linebarger, Cummins president and chief operating officer, said in a prepared statement before markets opened Tuesday.

While many key markets are showing strong growth, Linebarger acknowledged uncertainty in the global economy. The company dialed back its full-year revenue forecast to a range of $17.5 billion to $18 billion, which would be a 30-percent increase over 2010.

Government actions to reduce inflation in India and China have resulted in softer near-term demand than we previously expected, Linebarger said.

Cummin shares sank as much as 8.4 percent, to $90.50 per share, in mid-morning trading before rebounding more than 3 percent.

Cummins said it saw strong growth in several product categories, including global mining; oil and gas markets; trucking in North America and Brazil; and construction in Asia.

Segment sales were up across the board:

— Engine sales were $2.96 billion, up 43 percent from a year ago.

— Power Generation had sales of $874 million, a year-over-year increase of 10 percent.

— Components sales of $1.02 billion were up 32 percent year-over-year.

— Distribution sales were $783 million, an increase of 37 percent from a year ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT