IBJNews

Cummins posts record results for quarter, 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Cummins Inc. reported record results for 2011, earning $1.85 billion on revenue of $18 billion.

The Columbus-based diesel engine maker released its fourth-quarter and full-year earnings before markets opened Thursday.

Annual revenue rose 36 percent from the previous year and earnings rose 85 percent.

"Cummins had its best year ever in 2011, despite economic uncertainty in a number of regions," CEO Tom Linebarger said in a prepared statement. He noted that U.S. revenue was up 53 percent, while international revenue grew 27 percent. He said the company saw record revenue for the year in North America, Brazil, China and India.

Linebarger predicted that revenue will grow another 10 percent this year. He said he expects the company to reach $30 billion in sales by 2015.

Fourth-quarter revenue of $4.9 billion was up 19 percent from the prior year. It marked a new quarterly record for the company.

Earnings for the quarter were $548 million, or $2.86 per share. Excluding the sale of a light-duty filtration business and a flood-insurance settlement payment, income was $491 million, or $2.56 per share.

Fourth-quarter results were driven by higher demand in North American truck, construction, power generation, and oil and gas markets. Cummins said it also saw strong growth in global mining markets. Those markets offset weaker demand in China's construction industry and for power generation in India.

Cummins shares were up more than 6.6 percent, to $112.86 each, in early trading Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT