Cummins shares jump on 2-percent revenue boost

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of Columbus-based engine maker Cummins Inc. shot up 4 percent in Tuesday morning trading despite a reported 11-percent dip in profit for its second quarter.

Cummins posted earnings of $414 million for the quarter, or $2.20 per share, as compared with $465 million, or $2.45 per share, in the same quarter of 2012.

Revenue increased 2 percent, from $4.45 billion in the second quarter of 2012 to $4.52 billion this year. The most recent quarter’s revenue also marked a 13-percent improvement, from $3.92 billion in the first quarter of 2013. Profit for the first quarter was $282 million.

“Revenues increased primarily due to higher demand in North America, helped by market-share gains in the medium-duty truck market,” CEO Tom Linebarger said in a company release. “I am pleased with our execution this quarter and profitability improved significantly from first-quarter levels.”

Based on its current forecast, Cummins expects full-year revenue to be flat, compared with revenue of $17.3 billion in 2012.

Since the end of the second quarter, Cummins has increased its dividend 25 percent, to 62.5 cents per share. It will be payable Sept. 3 to shareholders of record on Aug. 22.

Shares of Cummins jumped 4 percent in mid-morning trading Tuesday, to about $121 per share.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.