IBJNews

Cummins shares slide on job cuts, lower forecast

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares in Cummins Inc. fell to the lowest level in three months Wednesday after the Columbus-based engine maker lowered its forecasts for revenue and profit and said it expects to cut as many as 1,500 jobs by the end of the year.

Its stock was trading at about $88 at noon, down almost 3 percent from Tuesday's $90.84 close. Earlier, they dropped to $86.50, the biggest intraday decline since July 10. The shares had gained 3.2 percent this year through Tuesday.

Cummins on Tuesday cut its forecast for full-year revenue to about $17 billion from $18 billion and reduced expectations for earnings before interest and taxes to about 13.5 percent from a range of 14.25 percent to 14.75 percent. That doesn’t include the cost or benefits of the job cuts.

“In my view this is worse than feared,” said Kristine Kubacki, a St. Louis-based analyst at Avondale Partners LLC. “My sense is the Street thought there would be a guide down, but this is sizable.”

Cummins, which has about 8,000 employees in Indiana, produces engines for trucks and power-generation equipment. The company had second-quarter earnings of $2.45 a share, excluding gains from divestitures. That exceeded the average of 18 estimates compiled by Bloomberg of $2.27.

“We continued to see weak economic data in a number of regions during the third quarter, increasing the level of uncertainty regarding the direction of the global economy,” Chief Executive Officer Tom Linebarger said in a statement. “As a result of the heightened uncertainty, end customers are delaying capital expenditures in a number of markets, lowering demand for our products.”

Class 8 truck orders fell 35 percent in North America last month to 15,205, according to FTR Associates.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Touche
    But its kind of hard for the working poor and most middle class families to do that these days. Some of us have health problems, had to pay for college ourselves and pay a tax rate higher than 14%.
  • @HOOSIERLIB
    Maybe this be a good "teaching moment" for Democrats. Always prepare for the worst. Keep at least 6 months of income in a liquid savings account, save save save, because it's your own responsibility to prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
    • Safety Net
      Hopefully, this doesn't ruin anyone's life or hurt's their family. That being said, this will provide a good "teaching moment" for Republicans, perhaps they will understand the need for a good social safety net and that executives care more about their bonuses, than they do about the lives employees. Unfortunately, their nominees for governor and President reflect the latter philosophy. People before profits!

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. So, Pence wants the federal government to ignore the 2008 law that allows children from these countries to argue for asylum in front of a judge. How did this guy become governor? And how is that we'll soon be subjected to repeatedly seeing him on TV being taken seriously as a presidential candidate? Am I in Bizzaro-U.S.A.?

      2. "And the most rigorous studies of one-year preschool programs have shown short-term benefits that fade out in a few years or no benefits at all." So we are going down a path that seems to have proven not to work very well. Right intention, wrong approach?

      3. Well for Dunkin Donuts it might say that even a highly popular outlet can't make a poorly sited location work. That little strip has seen near constant churn for years.

      4. Years ago, the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device companies shifted their research investment away from Medical Institutions to focus more on private research centers, primarily because of medical institution inefficiencies in initiating clinical studies and their inability/commitment to enroll the needed number of patients in these studies. The protracted timelines of the medical institutions were prompting significant delays in the availability of new drug and medical device entities for patients and relatedly, higher R and D expenditures to the commercial industry because of these delays. While the above stated IU Health "ratio is about $2.50 in federal funding for every $1 in industry funding", the available funding is REVERSED as commercial R and D (primarily Phase I-IV clinical work)runs $2.50 to $1 for available federal funding ($76.8B to $30.9B in 2011). The above article significatly understated the available R and D funding from industry......see the Pharma and Medical Device industry websites. Clearly, if medical institutions like IU Health wish to attract more commercial studies, they will need to become more competitive with private clinical sites in their ability to be more efficient and in their commitment to meet study enrollment goals on time. Lastly, to the reference to the above Washington Post article headlined “As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias", lacks some credibility as both FDA and Institutional Institutional Review Boards must approve the high proportion of these studies before studies are started. This means that both study safety and science must be approved by both entities.

      5. ChIeF and all the other critics – better is better no matter what. Get over it; they are doing better despite you ?

      ADVERTISEMENT