IBJNews

Daniels' health care team says answers pending

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' team of federal health care overhaul leaders told state lawmakers Wednesday that even without clear answers on the new law, it will cost the state hundreds of millions more in the coming years.

A new report this week assumed that if Medicaid isn't expanded, Indiana would still pay a combined $612 million over the next seven years as more residents who qualify for the program come out of the "woodwork" because of the health care law. Milliman, an actuary, is assessing the potential costs for the state.

Daniels has left two key decisions to whoever succeeds him — whether the state should establish its own insurance exchange and whether it should expand Medicaid coverage. Republican Mike Pence has not said what he would do, aside from continuing to oppose the health care law. Democrat John Gregg and Libertarian Rupert Boneham have said the state should run a "hybrid" exchange in coordination with the federal government.

Beyond those questions, however, state health overhaul consultant Seema Verma told members of the General Assembly the state is having trouble getting answers from the Obama administration on specifics of the new health care law.

"I do think that it's a huge challenge. There are so many unanswered questions," she said. "They haven't told us how much it's going to cost. I think it put states in very difficult positions."

Indiana health care advocates say, however, that many other states are moving forward with exchanges and seem to be having little trouble coordinating with the federal government.

"There are a bunch of other states that certainly would disagree with Seema that there's not enough information for them to make a decision and they're moving ahead on it," said David Roos, executive director of Covering Kids and Families of Indiana.

Verma also said the state would accept a one-year expansion of its health savings account plan, the Healthy Indiana Plan. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approved the state for an expansion at the end of July, but the Daniels' administration griped about not getting a requested five-year expansion or an answer whether the plan could serve as an expansion of Medicaid.

The state has until Oct. 1 to say which benefits would be covered in a state exchange and until Nov. 16 to decide whether to run an exchange.

The winner of the governor's race will have until 2014 to decide whether the state should expand Medicaid coverage.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hoosier Values
    I thought Indiana was the Champion of Values. Decent health care is one of the values.
  • nail on the head
    Totally agree - maybe I can get a second job to make more, get taxed more, and contribute what isn't rightly mine anyway. Socialism.
  • Let's do it
    Who cares how much it costs? I think, if you are lucky enough to work-especially lucky enough to work like me 10 to 16 hrs a day, you should feel obliged to cover health care for those who don't have to work a single hour a day. And hey, Obama's right, rich people like me should be willing to pay for them. It's my fault they can't or won't work. Please, just let me know how much more of my take home pay you need to support these people. Maybe, because I'm lucky, I can squeeze a couple more hours of work in each day to support my family and yours!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

    2. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

    3. If Whole Foods went in, I doubt the Nora one would stay open, and with all those customers coming to Broad Ripple traffic would be horrible, and forget about a run to the grocery on weekend nights. I think concern over the number of apartments is misplaced, but the 400 space parking garage has me concerned - someone needs to ask the developer just how much traffic they think this development is going to generate. I am not against more neighborhood residents, but heavy commercial traffic going in and out at that location sounds like a mess.

    4. I thought everyone was innocent until guilt was proven. Seems people have already convicted Reggie in the press. My nephew was a good kid and is a good man, more to this story im sure

    5. Going by the Marion County population only is of little use. 13th largest? No Way! To judge the real size of a metro area, the easy way is to look at the Arbitron rating list. Indianapolis hovers around 40th largest in the nation--sometimes more, sometimes less. Advertisers want to know exactly how large the population is before they buy radio advertising. Arbitron figured it out long ago. Indianapolis is estimated at 1,427,500. The real #13 is Seattle-Tacoma with a metro population of 3,470,400. So, the population of just Marion County is completely irrelevant to anything useful as far as metro area planning.

    ADVERTISEMENT