IBJNews

Daniels' health care team says answers pending

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' team of federal health care overhaul leaders told state lawmakers Wednesday that even without clear answers on the new law, it will cost the state hundreds of millions more in the coming years.

A new report this week assumed that if Medicaid isn't expanded, Indiana would still pay a combined $612 million over the next seven years as more residents who qualify for the program come out of the "woodwork" because of the health care law. Milliman, an actuary, is assessing the potential costs for the state.

Daniels has left two key decisions to whoever succeeds him — whether the state should establish its own insurance exchange and whether it should expand Medicaid coverage. Republican Mike Pence has not said what he would do, aside from continuing to oppose the health care law. Democrat John Gregg and Libertarian Rupert Boneham have said the state should run a "hybrid" exchange in coordination with the federal government.

Beyond those questions, however, state health overhaul consultant Seema Verma told members of the General Assembly the state is having trouble getting answers from the Obama administration on specifics of the new health care law.

"I do think that it's a huge challenge. There are so many unanswered questions," she said. "They haven't told us how much it's going to cost. I think it put states in very difficult positions."

Indiana health care advocates say, however, that many other states are moving forward with exchanges and seem to be having little trouble coordinating with the federal government.

"There are a bunch of other states that certainly would disagree with Seema that there's not enough information for them to make a decision and they're moving ahead on it," said David Roos, executive director of Covering Kids and Families of Indiana.

Verma also said the state would accept a one-year expansion of its health savings account plan, the Healthy Indiana Plan. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approved the state for an expansion at the end of July, but the Daniels' administration griped about not getting a requested five-year expansion or an answer whether the plan could serve as an expansion of Medicaid.

The state has until Oct. 1 to say which benefits would be covered in a state exchange and until Nov. 16 to decide whether to run an exchange.

The winner of the governor's race will have until 2014 to decide whether the state should expand Medicaid coverage.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hoosier Values
    I thought Indiana was the Champion of Values. Decent health care is one of the values.
  • nail on the head
    Totally agree - maybe I can get a second job to make more, get taxed more, and contribute what isn't rightly mine anyway. Socialism.
  • Let's do it
    Who cares how much it costs? I think, if you are lucky enough to work-especially lucky enough to work like me 10 to 16 hrs a day, you should feel obliged to cover health care for those who don't have to work a single hour a day. And hey, Obama's right, rich people like me should be willing to pay for them. It's my fault they can't or won't work. Please, just let me know how much more of my take home pay you need to support these people. Maybe, because I'm lucky, I can squeeze a couple more hours of work in each day to support my family and yours!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

    2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

    3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

    4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

    5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

    ADVERTISEMENT