IBJNews

Daniels says no presidential pitch made at dinners

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said Wednesday he has hosted about a dozen dinners with top Republican fundraisers and business and policy leaders, but never pitched himself as a potential presidential candidate.

Daniels said the dinners at the governor's residence began last spring and have included people who want him to consider a 2012 White House run. Daniels has agreed to keep the door open but says he has made no plans to run.

"People said we want to talk to you about it and we want you to maybe reconsider, so I said come talk," Daniels told reporters. "That's all it has been and most of the conversations have been about the problems facing the country. That is what I want to hear from people about — what do they think is to be done?

"Nobody was asked for a thing, not a dollar, not to lift a finger. I didn't even bring it up," Daniels said of a possible candidacy. "If they brought it up I told them exactly my point of view in exactly the words I've used with you folks and that is it."

Daniels was asked if the dinners were similar to gatherings George W. Bush had with top Republicans in 1999 before he was elected president the following year.

"I don't know what he did but there is a huge difference between having a plan (to run) and that is part of it and having no plan or intention whatsoever, and allowing people to come out here," Daniels said.

Daniels said the only reason he could think of for "this noise" about being a potential candidate is because people have noticed Indiana is doing a little better than most other places.

"I like important people, the kind of people who might one day bring a job or an investment to this state," he said. "I like that they want to come out here and have a look."

When asked if the discussions could have a bearing on whether he ultimately runs, Daniels said, "It might but I wouldn't say it has."

Daniels reiterated previous statements that he has tried to recruit four people to run for president. He has declined to say who they were.

"I just want to see it done well and I want to see this nation take a different course," he said. "If I can find some way to be constructive about it, I will."


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. To get a pay raise, the teacher must score a "4" on a rubric that only has a "4' as the highest score. therefore all the administrator has to do is mark you a '3" in one area and no pay raise. My wife's evaluation "interestingly" now is lower than the last three years and no pay raise. My brother teaches around Indy where all of a sudden the highest score is 3.25 ie frozen pay raises.This is a faulty scoring system when a teacher would have to score perfect in all categories.Meanwhile, the administrators all got pay raises and two more were hired.It will be interesting to see what the administrators spouses score.
    The state needs a scoring system the rewards an effective teacher not a perfect teacher. I taught bfor 40 years and never used a scoring system that required perfection to reward my top students

  2. 'Floundering' would seem to indicate the sport is not long for the world. Sixteen years seems like a long time to 'flounder.'

    When one looks objectively at the metrics that matter; e.g., sponsorship, attendance an ratings, all are up.

    Is this another of those silly hater deals where you hold the sport of today up against the sport of twenty years ago then try some cutesy, childlike comparison to validate your little straw man?

    Here's another question: What is the specific purpose of television ratings?

  3. It will be really nice having another parking garage across the street from the two already on Illinois's east side. And there is another huge one just north of Michigan. If we fill in the surface lot north of Vermont and tear down that ridiculously old fashioned Rink Building we can achieve something few other municipalities can boast of: a 3 full city block canyon of parking garages.

    Plus, if there is a building downtown that merits imitation it is the One America tower. I propose it be the standard for all future design. And I propose we change our city name to Dystopolis.

  4. What is it on it's way back from? Pick one, let's discuss:

    - All oval series = FAILURE
    - Control AOW, Kill Sport = SUCCESS
    - Quality Field versus Quantity Field = FAILURE
    - Driver Death/Poor Chassis Design = FAILURE
    - More American/Less Foreign Drivers = FAILURE
    - More Street Courses/Less Ovals = SUCCESS
    - Merger/Asset Aquire with CCWS = SUCCESS
    - Penske wins all the time = SUCCESS
    - LOTUS barely is 3rd Manufacturer = FAILURE
    - Less Major Network TV/More Obscure TV = SUCCESS
    - Traditions Sacrificed for Survival = SUCCESS

    These are just a few topics....how is Indy on it's way back up?

  5. Chicken in a Biscuit

ADVERTISEMENT