IBJNews

Daniels to promote online college WGU until taking over Purdue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mitch Daniels is still promoting the online college known as Western Governors University just months before he becomes Purdue University's new president.

Daniels has appeared in commercials for the past two years touting WGU, a not-for-profit with a board based in Salt Lake City. He signed an executive order in 2010 creating an Indiana branch of the online college.

His spokeswoman, Jane Jankowski, said Daniels "will continue to speak supportively of WGU" until his second term ends in January.

But the governor, who assumes Purdue's presidency in January, resigned from WGU's national board in June. And on Purdue's campus, Daniels' face is fading from advertisements that once featured him referring to WGU as Indiana's eighth public college.

WGU-Indiana chancellor Allison Barber said that change is coincidental, as are a new series of WGU television ads without Daniels.

She said the new WGU ads focus on students and were filmed in April, two months before Daniels was chosen as Purdue's next president.

"The governor is still a supporter, and he still promotes WGU-Indiana," Barber told the Journal & Courier  for a Sunday story.

Daniels' appearance in ads helped get the word out about WGU-Indiana, which this fall reached a milestone enrollment of 3,000 students, she said.

Since his selection as Purdue president, Daniels has stressed to the Purdue community that the West Lafayette school is not in competition with WGU. The online college's mission is to offer degree opportunities to those already working and first-generation college students.

WGU's website states that its degrees are competency-based, not credit-hour based like Purdue's. And WGU-Indiana's base tuition for a six-month term ranges from $2,890 for information technology students to $4,250 for those in the nursing program seeking Bachelor of Science degrees.

By contrast, Purdue's tuition is $9,900 this fall.

However, the rapid expansion of massive open online courses, or MOOCs, is generating a lot of discussion these days in higher education.

Purdue officials have cautioned against that model but are testing paid online programs and urging more faculty to consider courses that mix classroom and online elements.

J. Paul Robinson, chairman of the Purdue University Senate and a cytomics professor, said it's clear to many that Daniels' focus is on Purdue.

"One thing is for sure — Daniels will come into Purdue with his WGU experience and will be able to share that to become part of an overall knowledge base Purdue has in online education," Robinson said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Business law
    I need to write a case that deals with business or the us consiution.
  • Hmm
    This article's relevant because so many students' final top two college choices come down to Purdue vs Western Governors University.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT