IBJOpinion

DANIELS: Why can't everyone be more like Joe?

Deborah Daniels
October 5, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

DanielsI lost a friend this summer.

My law partner and longtime friend Joe Russell died suddenly at age 63 in July. Such a stunning event unleashes introspection: How could this happen to someone so young? How likely is it that I’ll keel over in the next year? Time to start planning vacations NOW.

But Joe’s death led to deeper considerations. You see, Joe Russell was what people used to call a “gentleman lawyer.” (I know what you’re thinking: That surely is an oxymoron.)

But in fact, the way Joe lived his life provided lessons for all of us. Lawyers learned from Joe that it is entirely possible to represent one’s clients zealously while treating other parties and their lawyers with respect and even friendship. Friends and opponents loved and admired him. (He was also one of the funniest guys you would ever hope to meet.)

Joe’s example also taught that, despite friendships between lawyers and judges, both must fully respect the need for fairness and impartiality in the system. Upon the appointment of his dear friend and colleague, Sarah Evans Barker, to the federal bench, Joe thereafter steadfastly referred to her as “Judge,” and while they maintained a close friendship for the rest of his life, he never crossed the invisible line between friendship and attempted influence.

Joe’s absolute belief in these principles has led the Indianapolis Bar Association to honor him with its annual Professionalism Award—this is perhaps the highest compliment any of us could hope to be paid.

But it is not only lawyers who should draw inspiration from Joe’s life.

Arthur Brooks of the American Enterprise Institute says there are two characteristics that allow political candidates to rise above petty politics and become true leaders: principle and tolerance. He could have been describing Joe Russell.

It is critical for a leader to know what he believes, and stand firmly on his principles. At the same time, one must be tolerant—respectful of the fact that others may disagree on principle and still be good, well-meaning people.

If President Obama were more like Joe, he’d seek consensus instead of speaking dismissively and pejoratively of those on the other side of the political aisle, even while ostensibly reaching across it.

If more members of Congress were like Joe, I am confident we would not have the gridlock we now suffer, and House and Senate Democratic leaders would not refer to those who disagree with them as “anarchists,” “fanatics” and “terrorists.”

If Indiana’s officeholders were more like Joe, we wouldn’t see politicians, unsatisfied with a mere win at the polls, seeking to ruin opponents’ reputations; or the intolerance demonstrated by some officeholders to, for example, the gay community.

We wouldn’t hear Hoosier candidates saying we need less bipartisanship; we’d see them seeking common ground with their political opponents for the benefit of us all.

If local politicians were more like Joe Russell, we wouldn’t see members of the City-County Council spiking reasonable mayoral proposals for political advantage. I’ve watched well-meaning councilors, including Democratic leaders, working with the mayor for the betterment of our community. But others make it as difficult for the council leadership as for the mayor to achieve progress.

If the political class were, collectively, more like Joe, more quality individuals would be willing to run for office—to enter what Teddy Roosevelt described as “the arena.”

I lost a friend this summer, but I hope his spirit will lead us all to become better people.•

__________

Daniels, a partner at Krieg DeVault LLP, is a former U.S. attorney, assistant U.S. attorney general, and president of the Sagamore Institute. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT