IBJNews

Dann Pecar nabbed by Ohio law firm in merger

Scott Olson
March 2, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the city’s oldest law practices has been absorbed by a regional law firm based in Cleveland.

Effective Monday, Indianapolis-based Dann Pecar Newman & Kleiman PC became part of Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP and changed its name to Benesch/Dann Pecar.

The firm's new moniker will be used locally for a transitional period of up to 18 months, before Dann Pecar ultimately is dropped altogether in favor of the Benesch name, said Jeff Abrams, Dann Pecar’s former managing partner. Abrams becomes a member of Benesch’s executive committee, taking the title of partner in charge of the Indianapolis office.

Founded in 1911, Dann Pecar has 29 lawyers and is the city’s 17th-largest law firm, according to IBJ statistics. It is located in the One American Square building.

Benesch was founded in 1938 and has 145 attorneys, 110 of whom are in Cleveland. It also has locations in Columbus, Ohio; Wilmington, Del.; White Plains, N.Y.; and Shanghai, China.

That range proved attractive to Dann Pecar, whose smaller size made it difficult to provide some legal services, Abrams said.

“We’ve had opportunities to obtain new clients and expand our work, but we didn’t have the skill set,” he said. “[Benesch has] a great amount of resources that we don’t have.”

Chief among them are Benesch’s health care and intellectual property practices, neither of which are among Dann Pecar’s strengths, Abrams said. Dann Pecar’s real estate work, however, was attractive to Benesch.

Leaders of Dan Pecar had been searching for a merger partner for a few years and had discussions with a handful of other firms before coming to terms with Benesch.

Two of the four firms Dann Pecar negotiated with are based in Indianapolis, said Abrams, who declined to name them.

“For whatever reasons, the others didn’t work,” he said. “But this one definitely became more and more inviting.”
 
Abrams acknowledged the past few years have been “a little challenging,” but he maintained the firm is profitable.

Benesch’s absorption of Dann Pecar allows it to continue its growth plans, Benesch Managing Partner Ira Kaplan said.

“Our strategic plan calls for growth in core practices, and Benesch and Dann Pecar match up very well in that regard,” he said. “It also is important to us to expand our Midwest presence, which provides us with broader reach and depth to better serve our clients.”

Meanwhile, one year short of reaching its 100-year milestone, Dann Pecar becomes the third Indianapolis firm in recent years to be swallowed by an out-of-state rival.

“This is more of the same, kind of the regional general practice firms realizing they have to grow to be competitive,” said Chuck Baldwin, managing partner of the local office of Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC.

The Atlanta-based Ogletree, which has 38 locations nationwide, entered Indianapolis in 2000.

Counting Dann Pecar, the last three Indianapolis firms to merge chose to hook up with Ohio rivals.  
 
In May 2008, Sommer Barnard PC became part of Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP.

Sommer Barnard was founded in 1969 and had 103 lawyers, making it the seventh-largest in the city, according to IBJ statistics.

Taft Stettinius, whose roots date to 1885, has 200 lawyers in Cincinnati. Its other Ohio offices are in Cleveland, Columbus and Dayton.

In December 2008, Locke Reynolds LLP, the city's eighth-largest firm, announced its 79 attorneys would join forces with Cincinnati-based Frost Brown Todd LLC’s roster of 370 spread among nine locations in five states.

The mergers signify a larger trend within the legal sector, as partners look to add more talent and offices to remain competitive. Nationally, the number of mergers and acquisitions had been rising for years, until the economy dampened activity last year.

The number of mergers and acquisitions consummated in 2009 totaled 53, a drop of 24 percent from the previous year, according to the Altman Weil Inc. consultancy in suburban Philadelphia.

Yet Altman expects to see more deals in 2010, “as those on hold pending 2009 year-end results are finalized.”  
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT