Deal provides peek at Anthem's narrow networks

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new agreement in Wisconsin provides a glimpse of the kind of “narrow network” arrangements Indianapolis-based Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield might attempt in Indiana.

Anthem’s Wisconsin unit and Milwaukee-based Aurora Health Care signed their first large client for a narrow-network plan, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Roundy’s Supermarkets Inc. will offer health insurance to its 8,000 employees that steers them to visit only Aurora’s 15 hospitals, 172 clinics and 1,500 physicians.

In exchange, Anthem and Aurora have offered Milwaukee-based Roundy’s savings of 8 percent or more off the trend in the marketplace. In September, Dr. David Lee, vice president of health care management for Anthem’s Indiana health plan, said he expected it would take savings of at least 10 percent to entice employers to embrace the narrow-network concept.

In Wisconsin, Anthem and Aurora also have agreed to take on some financial risk if they provide unneeded care or care that costs more without being more effective.

"We really feel we have a great partner to prove the model out quickly," Larry Schreiber, president of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Wisconsin, told the Journal Sentinel.

Roundy’s employees and their family members still can get care from non-Aurora doctors and hospitals—but they will pay much more out of pocket to do so. Roundy’s families that live outside of Aurora’s service areas or who are traveling will be able to visit any hospital or doctor that is part of Anthem’s national Blue Cross network.

As part of the health plan, Aurora will have employees at some Roundy's sites at least part of the week to help employees navigate the health care system and to help manage the care of those with chronic diseases.

"That's one of the advantages of our integration and size," Steve Bablitch, an Aurora senior vice president, told the newspaper. "We can do it and we are willing to try it."

In addition to Anthem, Aurora has a similar narrow-network agreement with Connecticut-based Aetna Inc. to sell health plans tied to its network. Aurora also contracts directly with employers who self-fund their employee health plans.

In Indianapolis, all the major hospital systems are considering narrow-network offerings. Indiana University Health pitched its plan to employers a couple of years ago, but hooked Indiana University as its only client. IU Health is a joint venture of the IU School of Medicine and Methodist Hospital, but it is a separate organization from Indiana University.

More recently, St. Vincent Health, Community Health Network and six hospitals that are part of the Suburban Health Organization agreed to form a consortium that will negotiate joint narrow-network contracts, which emphasize keeping patients healthy, with health plans and employers.

Anthem’s Indiana unit says it is currently building narrow-network plans to sell to individuals in the health insurance exchanges that will begin operating a year from now. After that, Anthem Indiana plans to create similar plans for the employer market.


  • Oh.
    Profound revelations?
  • http://www.philleo.com/personal-insurance/
    the health insurance plans are important because they must take into account the physical integrity at all times and must be a priority for the person at all times and in any situation that warrants using this service

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now