IBJNews

Decision on canal residential project delayed again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A city board’s vote to once again delay a decision on a proposed residential building along the Central Canal in downtown Indianapolis drew the ire of its developers.

The Metropolitan Development Commission on Wednesday afternoon continued the matter until its April 18 meeting after Valparaiso-based Investment Property Advisors resubmitted plans to the city March 14 showing the proposed building shrinking from 26 stories to 10.

Commission members granted the continuance on behalf of Maury Plambeck, director of the city’s Department of Metropolitan Development, who said his staff needed more time to review “significant modifications” to the plans.

The decision didn’t sit well with developers Larry Gough and Chase Sorrick, who drove from northwest Indiana expecting resolution on the plans, which they first submitted in November.

“We filed this petition four months ago,” Sorrick said. “It’s been continued, continued, continued. How long can this go on?”

The developer’s original plans for a 26-story tower designed for college students encountered resistance from neighbors over its height and impact on traffic in the area.

Investment Property Advisors reduced the size of the project to 10 stories to improve its chances of winning city approval. Under the proposal, the number of apartment units in the building shrank from 485 to 293.

The number of parking spaces also would shrink, from 434 to 236, within a three-level garage instead of the originally proposed six levels.

Two lawyers representing clients with business interests in the area also asked for a continuance to give them additional time to study the plans.

One, The Sexton Cos., owns and manages the nearby Gardens of Canal Court apartment complex. Its lawyer, Tim Ochs of Ice Miller LLP, said the change in plans is “drastic” enough to warrant extra scrutiny.

“Let’s face it, it’s student housing that’s proposed; in essence, a private dorm,” he said. “You’re looking at putting something there, that if not done properly, could have a significant impact on the canal. We better give that some thought and we better do it right.”

The project would be built on two adjoining parcels along Ninth Street between Senate Avenue and the canal: a 1.2-acre property that includes the offices and warehouse of B.B. Kirkbride Bible Co., and a 0.26-acre canal-front sliver of land that the city in August agreed to sell to the developer. Kirkbride is set to leave its property.

Despite the temporary setback, Investment Property Advisors still is hopeful construction can begin in the fall, which would allow the first residents to move in by summer 2014.

“We’re extremely disappointed, but we’re going to go forward,” Gough said. “We’ve reduced the size; we’ve reduced parking. I’m not sure what else we could do.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • JLS, IUPUI is right across the street
    JLS,

    First, I am not sure what "tone" you think the Canal has. It is a public asset that sits right across the street from a large public university. It is not a private playground for the monied-set. It was built with taxpayer dollars and is open to all people. If you have an issue with being around students, then perhaps the Canal is not the place for you to live.

    Second, there is no legal authority to dictate who may or who may not live on the canal. The city only can dictate zoning with respect to height, bulk, parking, etc. Whether students or multimillionaires live in the proposed apartment complex is absolutely not within the city's authority to determine.

    Finally, it is obvious that the the main objectors to this project are the current owners of apartments on the Canal (many which house a significant number of students) who want to keep a scarcity of apartments on the Canal to keep their rents high.

  • Out Of Towners
    The hold up is because the developers are from out of town and not local. The local developers are fighting this (behind the scenes of course) with our local government. They HATE it when someone else might make a dime in this city.
  • And we wonder why developers won't develope in Indy
    We continue to make it difficult to develop in our city, especially along the Canal! Finally someone is willing to put up the money for development and we continue to delay and block building until the developer takes his money and develops in a city where they are much more cooperative! When will we learn!
  • Dorm
    I agree with Tim Ochs (of Ice Miller LLP, who said that "it’s student housing that’s proposed; in essence, a private dorm." This does not fit in with the tone of the canal.
    • Dorm
      I agree with Tim Ochs (of Ice Miller LLP, who said that "it’s student housing that’s proposed; in essence, a private dorm." This does not fit in with the tone of the canal.
    • Please postpone it
      For the simple fact that this design is horrible, again it looks like the Ralston (Dolce) hotel..mixed with the convention center (with the "hat"). Dare I say the Cosmo is more contemporary, (see the Maxwell and Hudson as examples)...Can this city do something about bland design schemes with the typical look seen through out downtown. May I suggest NEW companies to design and build these..how about that Indy?
    • Get the design right
      I appreciate that it has been scaled back to 10 stories, but the truth is, the design is still very lacking....can't the developers try again? Hopefully, the city's stalling technique is designed to goad the developers into coming up with something better.....

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT