IBJNews

Defunct ATA Airlines awarded $66M in FedEx lawsuit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indianapolis jury has returned a $65.9 million verdict against Memphis-based FedEx in a breach-of-contract lawsuit brought in 2008 by now-defunct ATA Airlines.

The former Indianapolis carrier alleged FedEx broke a long-term contract with ATA to fly troops on behalf of the federal government. ATA ceased operations in April 2008, shortly after it was informed by FedEx that it would no longer be part of FedEx’s military contracting team.

Last week, the U.S. District Court jury said ATA is entitled to $21.9 million in lost profits for 2008 and $43.9 million in lost profits for 2009.

ATA originally had sought $94 million. Last April, however, FedEx won a partial summary judgment that tossed out some of ATA’s claims, leaving just the breach-of-contract charge.  In a recent regulatory filing prior to the Oct. 19 verdict, FedEx declared: “We still do not believe that any material loss is probable.”

“We respectfully disagree with the jury’s findings and are evaluating our options,” FedEx spokeswoman Sandra Munoz told IBJ on Monday.  It is widely expected that the company will appeal the verdict, which was reached after three hours of deliberations.

Any money ATA ultimately recovers will be distributed to creditors, including pilots, said Ken Broughton, an attorney for Texas-based Haynes and Boone LLP, which represented the airline.

In a statement, Broughton said that “unfortunately, any judgment ATA recovers from FedEx won’t revive" ATA.

According to bankruptcy records, ATA had 4,970 unsecured claims totaling $571.6 million as of June 30. The largest unsecured creditor listed is Wells Fargo Northwest, seeking $301 million.

ATA, founded in the 1970s by Latvian immigrant George Mikelsons, grew to be the nation’s 10th-largest scheduled passenger airline. An expensive fleet upgrade begun prior to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks came back to haunt ATA as the industry slowed in the years to follow.

ATA filed its first Chapter 11 reorganization in October 2004. At first, Southwest Airlines bought a portion of ATA stock, along with New York vulture firm MatlinPatterson.  ATA’s headquarters were moved to suburban Atlanta, where the carrier became part of a larger organization based there—Global Aviation Holdings, operator of charter carriers World Airways and North American Airlines.

Dallas-based Southwest walked away with ATA’s valuable gate slots, including those in New York City.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ATA & MatlinPatterson
    MatlinPatterson are INDEED a "VULTURE FIRM".

    They Screwed Varig in Brazil, they screwed ATA in the U.S., and they are currently pulling the purse-strings at Global Aviation Holdings (parent of World Airways & North American Airlines) in Peachtree City, Georgia.

    These people are nothing but VULTURES and don't give a damn about ANYTHING but profit.

    We all hope to God that the World Airways filing with the SEC to go public (again) takes-off, before World is stripped of its' assets and its' rich history.......

    SHAME ON YOU MatlinPatterson!!!!! You people are nothing but financial RAPISTS!
  • "Vulture" firms
    Let me learn you, Freudian Slip and Typo?Really? -- "vulture firm" is a real name on Wall Street for investment firms that buy assets of distressed companies, hoping to fixem' up and sell them later for a profit. Go back to reading the Star and have another fistful of Slim Jims.
  • Freudian Slip?
    That is the first time I have seen a Freudian slip in writing. How appropriate.
  • Typo? Really?
    "...New York vulture firm MatlinPatterson."

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Again, Maria.... how much are YOU contributing? The man doesn't HAVE to give a red cent! What don't you get about that? And, I know this might actually require some actual "facts", but can you please point me to the parking garage that the city gave to him?

  2. Another internet tuff guy I see. And what would the basis of taking the person to jail? If they were drunk, yea. But if not, there would be no jailable offense. All these gestapo, Nazi, jackboots are running SCARED. When the SHTF in this country who's side are you going to be on? The citzens, or the establishment? Better make up your mind quick because it's not far off. I would rather be trying to make friends than enemies. But no worries my "friend", God will take care of you and your likes in good time. It tells us that in the bible. If you stand, support and help carry out the plans of evil rulers, you will NOT be spared the wrath of God. That simple. All you can do is repent now and ask God to forgive you.

  3. Yes, Ersal, thank you for donating a whole $75,000, while the city gives you a parking garage for free and is going to pay for a multi million dollar stadium for you. I'd be donating money too if I was on welfare.

  4. I live and work in Broad Ripple and agree 100% that the traffic is not a significant problem. It can be slow at some times, but hey...this is an urban area. As for the development itself...HOORAY. Office and retail development brings people during the day, something that our community needs much more of. Thank goodness people are finally waking up to take advantage of the serene White River views. The BRVA land us committee endorsed the project because they know how these kind of projects help offset the cries of "too many bars". Pray that this development, and the proposed major investment by Browning, move forward. And remember Good Earth, these will mean hundreds of daytime people - potential shoppers for your store.

  5. Under current, previous existing law, this new law would be unconstitutional. Not that supposedly having to have a driver's license to drive isn't in the first place.

ADVERTISEMENT