IBJNews

Determining jobless rate far from exact science

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

So how bad is the jobs situation in Indiana, really?

The question is at the heart of the upcoming battle between business and labor that is practically guaranteed to push all other issues aside during the 2012 session. And yet the key number used nationally to determine just how deep in the muck we are, the unemployment rate, is the subject of its own debate.

"Everybody knows the number is very imprecise," Gov. Mitch Daniels said.

But that "imprecise" number will be a critical figure in the looming battle over a "right to work" proposal, the same issue that sparked a five-week walkout by House Democrats earlier this year and threatens to throw the 2012 session into chaos as well.

The stated reason for risking that chaos is job creation.

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma has taken his arguments to the airwaves in an ad that aired last week in Indianapolis and Fort Wayne. In it, Bosma uses the dour economy and the troubles veterans face finding jobs to argue that Indiana should become the 23rd state to ban businesses and private unions from negotiating contracts that mandate workers to pay labor fees.

Indiana's unemployment rate crept up to 9 percent in October, up from 8.9 percent the month before. The national rate dropped from 9.1 percent to 9 percent over that same period. These are the numbers most folks are used to hearing when reading official tallies of the struggling economy.

But the official unemployment rate only tracks people actively seeking work. House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, and others say it's flawed because it excludes people who have either stopped looking for work or are only working part-time.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics actually produces a range of estimates. The range runs from a very strict definition of who is looking for work to a looser definition of joblessness that includes people who want full-time work but are only working part-time. Not surprisingly, the broader the definition, the worse things look.

The broadest definition, which includes the so-called underemployed and anyone no longer seeking work, was 15.6 percent of the national labor pool in November. The most recent numbers for Indiana put the state at 15.9 percent through the second quarter of 2011.

So which number gets the nod — the more conservative, official unemployment rate or the broader definition?

The whole "How do you define unemployment?" debate is as old as the figure itself, said Steve Haugen, economist with the BLS division of labor force statistics.

After the Great Depression, lawmakers looking for a reliable and consistent measure of the nation's joblessness pondered whether desire to work should be considered or if measurements should focus only on what people are actually doing, he said.

Since then, presidential commissions have parsed and tweaked the official unemployment rate, but it has remained largely the same. What has changed is the introduction of new measures like the broader definition.

The larger number, which includes workers in part-time jobs who want to work full time, actually follows the same valleys and peaks as the official unemployment rate, Haugen said. So as a measure, the unemployment rate still shows where the national jobs situation is, where it's going and what it's done in the past.

Jerry Conover, director of the Indiana Business Research Center at Indiana University's Kelley School of Business, said each measure shows a different dynamic in the ailing economy.

"I would say maybe looking at the (unemployment rate) is a better measure of the degree of pain in the labor force," Conover said. "It can change not because there are more or fewer unemployed, but because the number of people out there looking for work changes."

"In that sense, the standard doesn't fully reflect the extent of people who want to work," he said. "If they're not looking, they don't count in that figure. That's why you have those additional measures."

The question now for Indiana's political leaders is which numbers they want to use in the upcoming debate.

Daniels says the state's month-to-month job numbers might not give a specific picture, but they give an accurate idea.

"We used to say in business when we admitted we didn't really know for sure (about) something, it is directionally correct. I think they're directionally correct," Daniels said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT