Developers need Greenwood's OK for disputed land

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Now that the Indiana Supreme Court has settled the lengthy Greenwood-Bargersville annexation battle, developer Mike Duke is ready to build on a 60-acre tract in the heart of the disputed territory.

The court's Jan. 31 decision in favor of Greenwood means Duke will have to go to the city for approvals for his proposed retail center at the southeast corner of Stones Crossing Road and State Road 135. It will be the Bargersville developer's first major retail project in Greenwood's city limits in many years. His recent projects, which include 240 acres at state roads 37 and 44, are in the town of Bargersville, south of the unincorporated Center Grove area.

"I tried to stay out of it as best I could," Duke said of the annexation fight. "I would hope there would be nothing held against me because I live in Bargersville."

Duke has already had informal talks with city planners, and his project is in keeping with Greenwood's master plan for the area, Planning Director Ed Ferguson said. "Most of the properties that front on State Road 135 will already be zoned commercial when that annexation is finalized."

Greenwood has relatively forgiving building standards. The city requires more landscaping than it did a decade ago, but the latest change in the past year and a half was to allow digital billboards and signs, Ferguson said.

Stones Crossing Road is the next unclaimed parallel on SR 135 as commercial development pushes south from Greenwood. Neighborhoods are already established on the west side of SR 135, and a Marsh Supermarket sits on the southwest corner, across from where Duke plans to build his retail center. The major intersection to the north, Smith Valley Road, is heavily developed with a Target, Home Depot, Menards and Meijer.

Duke said his center will likely be anchored by a grocery store, but he declined to talk about other interested tenants. There's potential for more upscale retailers at Stones Crossing Road, which is closer to wealthy neighborhoods to the south. The median household income in a three-mile radius is close to $73,000.

Drive another two miles south to Whiteland Road, where Duke's commercial division, Welbourne Cos., has a small strip center, and the median household income jumps to about $82,000, according to Welbourne Cos. spec sheets.

The Supreme Court decision coincided with an improving economy. "We're starting to see things loosen up just a little bit," Duke said.

The Greenwood-Bargersville fight began when the town, which had already extended sewer service to the area, tried to annex land that was within three miles of the city's limits, a move that requires permission from the landowners. Bargersville argued that it already had proper authority to annex because homeowners and developers in the area had signed waivers along with their sewer-service agreements years earlier. Greenwood argued that didn't meet the standard of permission.

Bargersville initially won the court battle, but the decision was overturned on appeal.

Both sides had hoped the court decision would provide a definitive answer about what qualifies as landowner permission. With one of the five judges recusing himself, the decision was a tie and went to Greenwood by default.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).