IBJOpinion

DINING: Better Late (Harvest) ... than just about anything else

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Dining - A&E

Spoiler alert: The following commentary is an unconditional rave meshed with a “you must try this” plea. It contains no caveats, no picky focus on overlooked details, no effort to find something, anything, to be negative about in order to maintain some semblance of a critical reputation. Further, it is written with the understanding that reading it might lead you to skip a car payment in order to take the family to this outstanding new eatery. IBJ takes no responsibility for such acts.

Onward.

ae-harvest-kitchn1col.jpg Snapper’s delight: The fish is fresh at Late Harvest Kitchen. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Given chef/owner Ryan Nelson’s background with The Oceanaire Seafood Room, we thought it wise to stay close to the sea on our first visit to Late Harvest Kitchen (8605 River Crossing, 663-8063). We were wise, indeed, to start with the Brandade ($10), in which salt cod and fresh cod, olive oil and cream come out to the table in a bubbling dip. I started by topping the accompanying house brioche with the creamy deliciousness, but found myself soon abandoning the bread in favor of direct hits by the forkful. The dish, deceptively placed on the Small Plates portion of the menu, gave clear indication that, while the food

at Late Harvest is carefully crafted, the kitchen clearly doesn’t want anyone leaving hungry.

That feeling was reinforced by the Daily Whole Fish ($28), a complete snapper (sans life force) in a sweet chili glaze. It’s filleted tableside, unless you opt to do it yourself while the unfortunate creature stares down your dining companions. The portion was enormous, but every taste seemed carefully created. Halibut ($26) sounded exotic on the menu—with Indian spices, roasted tomatoes, sunflower shoots and cucumber raita—but those additions accented, rather than dominated, the attractively presented fish, bringing out its inherent flavors.

We sided our seafood with a sharable (for a hockey team, let alone a dining pair) plate of Potatoes Minneapolis ($9), a glorious hash brown mound festooned with bacon chunks, sour cream and chives. It, along with a fair amount of the snapper, found its way out the door in a leftover container, bringing great pleasure to a diner at home.

Not that we had any room for dessert, but when the rest of the meal is so satisfying, who can say no to a housemade dessert, even if there’s no secret stomach chamber in which to deposit it? The Sticky Toffee Pudding ($8) was well worth the addition. It didn’t even matter that we could find room for no more than a few bites of the sizable chunk of bread pudding, which is served in a pond of butterscotchy wonder that would make Willy Wonka drool.

The staff at Late Harvest was professional but not pushy, the decor elegant but not intimidating, and the food, well, I’ll just say I’m hoping the about-to-open Ocean Prime that stands between it and East 86th Street won’t deter diners from trying one of Indy’s best restaurants. Late Harvest shouldn’t fall in the shadow of any other restaurant, chain or local.•

—Lou Harry

__________

Third in a month-long series of Keystone Crossing/Clearwater Crossing-area restaurant reviews.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT