IBJOpinion

DINING: Fountain Square eatery is taqueria of the town

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Dining - A&E

There’s something movie-set-like about Fountain Square after 11 p.m. Like no other place in the city, it has a noir-ish beauty that feels organic rather than planned.

I’ve got one more reason to see that time of day in that part of town now that Revolucion (1132 Prospect St. 423-9490) has taken over a sizable bar space.

Open Fridays and Saturdays until 1 a.m., Revolucion has a simple menu: Pinchos (appetizers), Tacos (in pairs) and Burgers. Order them at the bar. Grab a beer while you’re at it. And take a seat.
 

Tacos at Revolucion Revolucion, serving tacos, tacos and more tacos, recently took over a Fountain Square storefront. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

I would have guessed the ingredients were fresh in the hearty green scoop of guacamole that comes with chips ($5.95) even if I hadn’t witnessed local growers selling their produce to management. Less successful were the Patatas Bravas ($4.95)—fried potato chunks in a spicy pepper sauce that tasted like they were concocted with fridge findings after a long fraternity party. They were filling and compulsively edible but nothing to boast about.

Better were Revolucion’s raison d’être: the tacos, served in baskets on doubled tortillas. With prices fixed at $5.95 per pair (with a dollar upcharge for seafood), they all satisfied thanks to fresh ingredients and appropriate variables. The Fish offered grilled tilapia with a nice shredded cabbage/fruit salsa accent. The Shrimp was packed with medium-sized crustaceans, garlic, lime and cilantro. The Chicken features slow-cooked, all white meat fowl just moist enough to go down easy.

This being a late-night, post-show stop, we didn’t head into the back for socializing at the Tiki Bar (A Tiki bar in a Mexican food joint? Viva la melting pot!). Instead, we strolled out to the fountain, half expecting Philip Marlowe to wander by.

The only real mystery here, though, is why Revolucion isn’t yet open for lunch.•

—Lou Harry

__________

Fourth in a month-long series of reviews of new arts district eateries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT