IBJOpinion

DINING: Game on at food-and-play spot

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E
Allow me to make a Skee-Ball analogy: When you play Skee-ball and aim for the 100-point hole, you miss most of the time. However, if you aim for the 30, you have a much better chance of scoring. You might not get a high score, but you'll win enough tickets to want to play again.

How does that translate into my dining experience at the new Dave & Buster's (8350 Castleton Corner Drive, 572-2706)? Well, on my first visit, which was part of a special preview day, when the wait staff and the kitchen were working out the kinks, I aimed high. I tried stuff from the higher end of the menu, where steak and shrimp roam.

Since that wasn't an official open-for-business day, I'll refrain from comment—except to say that I was more cautious when I returned during open-for-regular business hours. I, figuratively, aimed for 30s instead of 100s. And I'm glad I did.

My two companions and I stuck largely to Dave & Buster's $15.99 Eat & Play deals. And why wouldn't we? These include a choice of eight entrees and a $10 game card. For customers who intend to hit the arcade (and why else would you be here), that makes a meal—sans drink—come in below the price of an average kid meal.

My dining trio found satisfaction in a massive double cheeseburger (which arrived with fries instead of the requested mashed potatoes), densely breaded but still meaty Goldfingers (what the management calls chicken strips) served with a side of gravy, and Black Jack BBQ Chicken. The latter featured a sizable pair of grilled chicken breasts glazed in Jack Daniel's sauce accompanied by bacon-speckled mashed potatoes and a sizable side of green beans.

An appetizer, Philly Steak Rolls ($7.99), arrived concurrent with the entrees, which is a pet peeve of mine. A passing manager noted our dismay and quickly offered to take it off the bill, insisting that we still keep it and try. Nice move.

Was it worth it? With cheese steak meat crammed into a deep fried shell, with chopped banana peppers, tomato,
sweet and spicy ketchup and cheese sauce for topping, yes, it was worth it—but better suited for heftier appetites.

Dessert choices included a massive Mug Sundae ($5.99) densely packed with vanilla ice cream and topped with chocolate sauce, candied pecans, and whipped
cream. We partnered it with a paper cone of hot Donut Holes ($6.39), accompanied by both the aforementioned chocolate sauce and strawberry sauce for dipping.

As fun as these orbs were, most of them went home. After all, we had game cards burning holes in our pockets. •

___
_

Fourth in a month-long series of reviews of possessive restaurants. Follow us on Twitter at IBJDining.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

Multimedia

Calendar

  • IBJ Event

More ListingsSubmit a Community Event
ADVERTISEMENT