IBJNews

DINING: The year in restaurants

Lou Harry
December 29, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

Last week in this column, I wrote about Cerulean, the joyfully creative new culinary addition to downtown that comes to Indy via an unlikely route through Winona Lake. I’d have no trouble declaring it the best new restaurant in the area except for one thing: Late Harvest Kitchen also opened in 2012.
 

ae-harvest-kitchn1col.jpg(IBJ File Photos

Late Harvest Kitchen is the outstanding-in-different-ways north-side eatery where, in the hands of chef/owner Ryan Nelson, cod and cream transform into addicting Brandade, where Potatoes Minneapolis is perfectly at home, and where Sticky Toffee Pudding would make Willy Wonka drool.

Mix lunch at Cerulean with dinner at Late Harvest and all you need to complete a perfect dining day is breakfast … and now we have Eggshell Bistro at Carmel City Center.

But that would leave out Bluebeard, the oasis on the Cultural Trail between downtown and Fountain Square. And Punch Burger, the line-’em-up-for-lunch newbie that proves customers have no beef with new sandwich shops if the quality is high. (No comment on the influx of Jack in the Box.)


ae-dining-bluebeard-1col.jpg  Late Harvest Kitchen, top, and Bluebeard, above, are among the quality additions to Indy’s dining scene.

Those five stand-outs weren’t the only local additions to the menu, though. While there are too many to be exhaustive here, newcomer highlights this year included sandwich purveyor Fermenti Artisan perking up City Market, Lino’s Coffee doing the same for Speedway and B’s Po-Boy adding New Orleans flavor to Fountain Square.

Some newcomers are as important for where they are as what they serve. Ralston’s turned the sadly empty Agio space into a vibrant hangout. Sabbatical spruced up the people-watching options in Broad Ripple. The food court at the Fashion Mall got a much-needed, transformational makeover, opening the doors to some new-in-the-market options. And Latitude 39 reminded us that, yes, you can find new uses for an abandoned multiplex.•

–Lou Harry

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT