IBJOpinion

DINING: Time marches on at recently revamped Tick Tock Lounge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E
ae-dining-ticktock-4-15col.jpg Onion rings don’t require an upcharge at Tick Tock Lounge. (IBJ photo/Eric Learned)

While restaurants, like people, tend to gravitate toward one another, others are outliers. These islands of eating—usually taverns—primarily serve customers within walking (or stumbling) distance. For most, the expectations aren’t high and neither is the amount of attention focused on them.

Occasionally, the kitchen offerings at these drinkeries rise above the serviceable. I’ll happily accept an invitation, for instance, to join friends at The Workingman’s Friend for burgers, or warm myself over a bowl of the title dish at John’s Famous Stew. And I’d hoped that, with some recent sprucing up, the food at Tick Tock Lounge (2602 E. 10th St., 634-8625) would be worth touting.

On the plus side, Tick Tock has an upgraded beer menu, cleaned-up interior, and is mercifully free of blaring TVs or blasting music. If you are so disposed, Tick Tock infuses its own vodka and prides itself on its signature Bloody Marys, but it doesn’t try to over chi-chi its menu to try to make you forget it’s a neighborhood bar.

On the downside, nothing we sampled from the lunch menu stood out enough to warrant a special trip. A Hot Winger Dip appetizer ($6.99) looked promisingly different but the slightly spicy chicken strips and hot cheese were undercut by limp house-fried tortilla chips. A heavy-on-the breading Breaded Tenderloin ($7.99) was more successful than the overly dry Chicken Sandwich (6.99). Helping matters: No upcharge for replacing fries with onion rings or tater tots.

On the meat side, a Philly Steak Sandwich ($7.99) ambitiously opted for chunks of steak instead of the traditional shaved variety. And my bad for ordering a single Hamburger ($6.99) instead of the double ($7.99), since the latter would have been in better balance with its bun.

Desserts? None available on our visits … although, on the right night, bacon-infused vodka might have served that purpose just fine.•

__________

Last in a month-long series of theme-less restaurant reviews.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT