Discount retailers, grocers await impact of food-stamp cut

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Annie Crist says she dreads telling her two daughters that cuts in food-stamp benefits taking effect Friday means less chicken and fewer hamburgers for dinner.

And with deeper cuts looming as part of a possible U.S. budget deal, Crist and other recipients may feel an even greater pinch — along with retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corp. and Kroger Co.

“I don’t bother them or worry them with adult issues or adult problems,” Crist, a 30-year-old self-employed babysitter in Lancaster, Ohio, southeast of Columbus, said. “But if they ask me, ‘Well, why can’t we get this? We always get this,’ how am I going to explain that?”

Food-stamp spending reached a record $78.4 billion in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, due in part to a temporary boost in benefits passed as part of the 2009 economic stimulus that expires Friday. Lawmakers battling over U.S. farm and budget policy are looking to cut deeper by tightening eligibility rules that could drop as many as 3 million people from the program.

With an estimated 8 percent of shoppers using food stamps, the impact will probably be felt most acutely by discount retailers such as Dollar General Corp., Family Dollar Stores Inc. and Wal-Mart, said Bryan Gildenberg, chief knowledge officer of Kantar Retail.

“You’ll find the effects will happen quite quickly,” Gildenberg said. “These are shoppers that have probably already allocated their spending down to the dollar.”

Few extras

Crist said her budget leaves little room for extras. The $547 a month she received in food benefits for herself and her daughters, ages 13 and 8, will become $497 Friday, as a roughly 5-percent benefit cut takes effect nationwide. With utilities and other expenses, she said she will be spending less on fresh meats, fruits and vegetables at the grocery store.

Grocers say they’re watching the situation closely. “We’re a little concerned about the food-stamp cut, I can tell you that,” Dennis Eidson, president and CEO of Spartan Stores Inc., a Grand Rapids, Mich.-based grocer, said on a conference call Oct. 24. “That could be a meaningful event for us.”

Kroger, the biggest U.S. grocery chain, said it doesn’t expect the food-stamp drop to affect its sales. “Customers may shift to spending more of their cash on food and less cash on other things,” Keith Dailey, a spokesman for the Cincinnati-based company, said in an e-mail.

SNAP enrollment

Monthly enrollment for what’s officially called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program peaked last December at 47.8 million. It was 47.6 million in July, according to the most-recent data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That’s up from 28.2 million five years ago, when the program’s annual cost was $37.6 billion. Friday’s reduction in aid is equal to the amount donated to churches, synagogues and private food banks, according to a study by Washington, D.C.-based anti-hunger advocate Bread for the World.

“All retailers who sell food are likely to feel the impact of cuts, since people receiving assistance often don’t have excess income to make up the difference,” said Jennifer Bartashus, senior analyst for food retailing for Bloomberg Industries.

Big-box retailers

Almost half of all food stamp redemptions are in big-box supercenters such as Wal-Mart or Target, while most of the rest are in supermarkets, she said. Of the total $72.9 billion in food stamps redeemed, $36.2 billion went to supercenters such as Wal-Mart and Target, and $25 billion to supermarkets, she said.

Stores with a higher portion of low-income customers will lose some revenue, though it could partially be offset by those trading down to discount-style stores, Bartashus said. The cuts could change shopping patterns for those on assistance toward store-brand items, which are generally cheaper than name-brand, she said.

Target spokeswoman Amy Joiner said in an email that “we are monitoring the situation but aren’t going to discuss or speculate on impact to the business.”

Asked for comment, a Wal-Mart spokesman referred to remarks made by CEO Bill Simon on Oct. 15. Simon told analysts that the Bentonville, Ark.-based company, which is the biggest U.S. food-seller and retailer, may see some benefits from the reduction.

“Price will become more important” as food-stamp recipients pay more nutrition costs out of pocket. “And when price is more important, we’re more relevant,” Simon said.

Detroit grocer

At Najib Atisha’s two grocery stores in Detroit, about 50 percent of his customers in one location use food stamps and 70 percent in the other, said the owner.

“Many of our customers really don’t have any source of income,” Atisha, 55, said. If those customers can’t buy, “we can’t turn product over, it sits on the shelf longer, and then we have issues of quality control with our fresh foods.”

Atisha employs 40 people between the two stores. He said that while he’s watching government actions, he hasn’t yet made any changes in response to his anticipated income loss.

The reduction in benefits will ripple through the economy, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said Friday.

“If you can buy more at the grocery store, you will buy more at the grocery store,” Vilsack said in an interview on C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” program to air Nov. 3. “If you can buy more, that means the grocer has to stock more that’s been purchased and processed and trucked to their facility. All of those are jobs in the supply chain. And it also means, obviously, producers -- farmers and ranchers and producers -- have to sell more and have a market to sell more. So it has an impact.”

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said on Oct. 30 that food stamps are among the items Republicans are eying for additional cuts as part of a House-Senate conference panel working to reconcile differences between Republican and Democratic budget blueprints for fiscal 2014.

The Senate-passed budget for fiscal year 2014 is about $90 billion more than a House-passed version. Farm bills being debated in a separate committee trying to replace agricultural legislation that expired Sept. 30 are considering cuts ranging from $18 billion over 10 years in the Senate plan to $52 billion in the House.

House plan

Of those amounts, the Senate would take $3.9 billion from nutrition programs while the House would cut $39 billion, according to nonpartisan congressional estimates. The House plan would also require work or job training and let states drug-test recipients as a condition of eligibility.

Rep. Marlin Stutzman, an Indiana Republican, said earlier this week that lawmakers should support the House food-stamp proposal as well as a timeline that divorces it from its longtime ties to farm aid.

“The American people are tired of this type of out-of-control spending,” he said in a prepared statement. The plan, he said, represents “dramatic reform.”

Margaret Keith, a 73-year-old widow from Ashfield, Mass., said she relies on food stamps and Social Security. She said she doesn’t know what’s left to cut.

“I am really skimming through right now,” she said.

For Crist, the challenge will be the simple squeeze on resources, and her desire to raise healthy daughters. “What worries me the most is just not being able to make it stretch,” she said. “The money only goes so far.”


  • $547 per month!
    There are three adults living under our roof these days and I can tell you we eat well, and don't spend anything like $547 per month. My guess is that the lady in the story is not being very thrifty. I have seen people in grocery stores using SNAP for things that I normally pass on because I consider them too expensive. The lady is 30 and a self-employed babysitter. Her kids are school age so she could be out doing something else.
  • Please
    We have a family of five and have budgeted ourselves $650/month to spend at the grocery store. We get the things we need and plenty of extras as well. We are fortunate enough not to need food stamps and put a budget in place so we can instead save money. I have a hard time believing that a family of 3 can't live on $497/month and still eat well.
  • $547/month!
    I live alone and spend about $65/week on groceries and I eat well (even prime rib once a week-lots of fish, chicken, and pork, too). I could easily feed one more for not a lot more. Add that third person, that could not be THAT much more. I do not buy junk food and seldom buy prepared food. There is a lot of money wasted here. I do think Food Stamps are often misused--I have heard of college students that get them and sell them for extra cash. I see all the junk food people use the stamps for. They are often misused. It seems that if people used them wisely, they'd go a lot farther.
  • More on the above
    The coding process wouldn't have to fall on the merchant. When the products are labeled before shipment the code could be embedded then, during the labeling process at the factory. There ya go, I just saved you a bunch of money.
  • EBT Abuse!!
    I do believe if the program was set up to counter EBT abuse there would be plenty available without cuts. I'm not saying everyone abuses their food stamp rations but I have seen more that do than those who don't. I do believe if the system was set up so when an items bar code was scanned it also approved it for an EBT purchase that would stop much of the abuse of buying items that were not meant to be purchased with an EBT card. This would not be difficult to do. Those stores wanting the privilege of accepting these cards would have to code them properly.If they were caught abusing this they would be subject top a hefty fine and loss of the privilege forever. All we need is a new marshal in town.
    • Serious?
      I could certainly raise two young children, 13 and 8, on $547 a month for groceries. Just guessing, but I wouldn't be surprised if her two daughters also receive free breakfast/lunch at school. Shop deals and fix healthy meals.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

    2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

    3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

    4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

    5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.