IBJNews

Districts: Full-day kindergarten funds not enough

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels' plan to allocate $47 million for full-day kindergarten in districts that don't offer it isn't likely to be enough to make that vision a reality, some districts say.

"He's trying to act like it's a big deal and this is wonderful and everybody's going to get full-day kindergarten. I don't believe that's going to be the case," said Nancy Farley, director of student services for Anderson Community Schools.

An upswing in state revenues prompted Daniels earlier this month to announce he was recommending the new state budget include an additional $150 million for K-12 education. About a fourth of that would be used to bring full-day kindergarten to the 25 percent of districts that don't currently offer it.

While the news was hailed by many, some districts say the money isn't enough to fund the full-day programs.

"Right now, today, sitting here, this means 20 additional dollars per student, but it's not a significant enough amount that changes our situation," Joel Martin, superintendent of Oak Hill United School Corporation in Grant County, told the Chronicle-Tribune in Marion.

Indiana does not require students to attend kindergarten. The state provides funding for half-day kindergarten programs and gives an additional amount for students in full-day programs. Those dollars are divided among all full-day kindergarten students across the state.

John Trout, Madison-Grant United superintendent, said districts get $2,951 per half-day kindergarten student. The current full-day grants provide an additional $1,030, but he said he would still be about $2,000 short of the cost to educate a student all day even with additional K-12 funding.

Farley contends the additional kindergarten funding will benefit more affluent districts that don't qualify for Title I funding.

She told The Herald Bulletin in Anderson that the state needs to make kindergarten mandatory, which would give districts more money.

District leaders say full-day kindergarten is a key tool in creating successful students.

"The sooner you start off, the better students they will be," said Michael Powell, superintendent of Mississinewa Community Schools.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Yeah for the House
    Improving the capacity of our citizens to become better educated and to more easily access jobs, is a much better use of state funds than a tax payer refund, which would amount to a very small refund per person. I just hope our legislators - and Governor - put education funds to use for preschool.
  • Not enough? Too much.
    Here's a surprise: school districts complaining that they haven't been handed enough taxpayer money. I'd like to see the offices where the people who were quoted sit their well-padded backsides. My guess: leather judges' chairs, school-funded vehicle, district-supplied cell phone, and God knows what other perks. Take the $150K salaries out of the equation for these useless administrators, and I'm sure there's plenty to go around.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT