MARCUS: Diversity reigns among state's economies

Morton Marcus
November 14, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Not every county in Indiana is like every other county. This is important to understand (particularly if you are a state legislator) because we cannot assume one remedy is appropriate for all ills statewide. Likewise, your county is not unique, probably not even distinct from other Indiana counties. This is important to understand (especially for members of the General Assembly) because it is unlikely the problems your county faces deserve unique legislative attention.

Where is what done in Indiana? First, let’s look at farming. Statewide, farming accounts directly for 0.8 percent of the state’s earnings by individuals (figures are for 2007). The top five farming counties are all in the northwestern quadrant of the state. Another 15 counties derive more than 5 percent of their earnings from farming. In 49 of Indiana’s 92 counties, farming amounts to less than 2 percent of earnings.

Second, consider manufacturing, Indiana’s most important sector, with one-quarter of the state’s earnings. Howard County is most dependent on manufacturing at 59 percent, followed by five more clustered around 55 percent. Another 25 counties derive a third to half their earnings from manufacturing. Only six counties (including Hamilton) receive less than 10 percent of their earnings from manufacturing.

Next to manufacturing, private health care is the second-largest sector in our economy. (Health care provided by government institutions are not included here.) Statewide, private health care accounts for 9.7 percent of Hoosier earnings, but we have data for only 55 of the 92 counties. Disclosure issues limit our analysis for this and many other sectors, but we won’t go into the oddities of efforts to protect the privacy of individual firms.

According to the available data, Delaware County is most dependent on health care, with 19 percent of its earnings originating in that sector. Low shares (under 5 percent) of earnings are found in 14 counties. Does this indicate inadequate access to health care? Let’s hope no one in a position of authority says “yes” to that question without some intense thought and investigation.

Cutting the data a different way, we find that real estate services are the most concentrated: Marion and Hamilton counties alone account for 50 percent of earnings originating in that sector. Those two counties also provide 48 percent of earnings from professional and technical services.

By contrast, farming is the least-concentrated activity, followed closely by utilities, local government, manufacturing and retail trade. When you think about it, only manufacturing is a surprise. Every place has utilities, local government and retail trade. But that manufacturing should be among the least-concentrated activities suggests Indiana is truly a state where manufacturing is pervasive, vital to the economies of most counties.

Among the counties, Martin, with the Crane facility, has the most concentrated economic activity (75 percent of earnings originating on federal payrolls). Heavy manufacturing counties are heavily concentrated as well.

Beyond that we dare not go because of missing data stemming back to those infamous disclosure problems. For example, only 65 percent of earnings in Monroe County are reported by sector by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. What’s missing? State and local governments. Why are these missing? Only BEA can say. We can guess there is concern about the size of Indiana University in the state sector. But IU is a public agency. Why are public data suppressed?

These disclosure issues are found in state as well as federal data. For example, why can’t we have accurate sales tax revenue by county when such data are available in other states?

You’ll excuse me now. I have to take anti-depressants every time I deal with the incomprehensible disclosure rules of our statistical agencies.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...