IBJNews

Don Marsh to keep $2.2M severance from grocery chain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Don Marsh has won a partial victory in his four-year federal court battle with the company that he once led.

Judge Sarah Evans Barker issued an order Monday allowing Marsh to keep nearly $2.2 million in severance paid by Marsh Supermarkets Inc., which had attempted to recover the payments from its former CEO.

The order stems from a two-week civil trial in February after which a federal jury ordered Marsh to pay the local grocery chain $2.2 million, finding that he used company money to finance global travels to entertain mistresses and other unnecessary personal expenses.

If Barker's Monday ruling had gone against Don Marsh, he could have ended up owing his former company as much as $4.4 million if he was forced to give back the portion of his severance he’s already received.

Andrew McNeil, an attorney representing Don Marsh, said his client is pleased with the judge's interpretation of his employment contract. But “he’s sad and disappointed that it played out publicly when his passion has always been groceries and the grocery business."

An attorney for the supermarket chain could not be reached Tuesday morning.

Don Marsh’s missteps have become public knowledge, Barker wrote in her order, but she said company directors charged with supervising him undoubtedly fell asleep at the wheel.

“The unavoidable post-trial hurdle for the company is that the company wrote the plan it now asks the court to retroactively administer in a way that alters its terms to its advantage,” she wrote. “This we cannot do.”

After Marsh Supermarkets sued Marsh in federal court in 2009, he countersued, asserting the company improperly withheld his post-retirement payouts in 2008 and still owed him about $2.1 million. The jury denied his counterclaim.

Marsh left the company he had led since the late 1960s following its purchase in September 2006 by Sun Capital Partners, a Florida private equity firm.

Marsh Supermarkets stopped the severance payments after it said an Internal Revenue Service audit found “disallowed deductions” for personal expenses he racked up from April 2004 to September 2006. The company ultimately paid the IRS a $616,000 penalty.

The nine-member jury in February found that Marsh committed breach of contract and fraud, but stopped short of delivering Marsh Supermarkets a total victory.

Although the grocery chain asked for $1.6 million to cover expenses and penalties related to the IRS audit, the jury awarded the company half that amount on its fraud claim, saying it shared responsibility. The jury also awarded the company $1.4 million on its breach-of-contract claim.

Barker denied a request from the company to collect $1.8 million in life insurance policy premiums paid on Marsh’s behalf.

Many of the arguments presented by both sides involved implications of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, a federal law governing pension plans.

“Nearly four years ago, in what was apparently a rare moment of harmony,” Barker wrote, “both parties conceded that ERISA governs only part of Mr. Marsh’s employment agreement.”

Barker concluded that ERISA provisions made the $2.2 million in severance paid to Don Marsh "vested and nonforfeitable"—a reality she said the company has to live with even though Don Marsh "behaved in a manner unbecoming of a CEO."

Barker also found that Don Marsh can recover attorneys’ fees relating to his ERISA claims. But she also found that the company can recover fees relating to non-ERISA claims.

Lawyers for Marsh and Marsh Supermarkets are still determining the breakdown of those fees.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT