Drugmakers, pharmacists at odds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. and its peers are increasingly clashing with pharmacies in an effort to keep patients buying their brand-name drugs.

Indianapolis-based Lilly recently rejected CVS Caremark’s demands for big price discounts on its insulins, Humalog and Humulin, according to The Wall Street Journal. In response, CVS kicked Lilly’s insulins off the list of medicines it recommends to the employers and health plans for which CVS acts as a pharmacy benefits manager.

Being off the list could prompt CVS’s clients not to cover Lilly’s insulins, because they would get a smaller rebate on the drugs, the Journal reported. CVS said customers could get insulins made by Novo Nordisk A/S for less money.

"In light of the aggressive pricing required to win this business—and the fact that only a small percentage of Lilly's insulin franchise would be impacted by this change—we ultimately decided it did not make good business sense for Lilly to be included," Lilly officials said in a statement.

Last year, Lilly underbid Denmark-based Novo Nordisk to win an exclusive contract to provide the insulins sold by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. under its ReliOn brand name.

In another battle that could set a precedent for the industry, New York-based Pfizer Inc. has tapped an outside firm to set up a mail-order pharmacy so it can sell the cholesterol drug Lipitor directly to consumers.

Even thought Lipitor loses patent protection in the United States on Wednesday, Pfizer will offer the drug at a price that has a similar co-pay to its new generic competitor, atorvastatin. Some pharmacy benefit mangers, such as New Jersey-based Medco Health Solutions, have agreed to lower Lipitor co-payments to the price of a generic and reject claims for atorvastatin.

"Previously, Big Pharma has tended to walk away" from top-selling drugs once they lose patent protection, Pfizer CEO Ian Read told the Journal. "Now, we have a flat-out different culture."

If Pfizer’s plan retains even a fraction of Lipitor’s $13 billion per year in worldwide sales, it may prompt other companies facing giant patent expirations—which would include Lilly—to follow suit.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing