Durham willingly turning over assets in Fair bankruptcy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

Investors in Fair Finance Co. haven’t received much in the way of good news since the Tim Durham-owned company halted interest payments and stopped cashing in investment certificates in November.

But here’s some that’s more than a little surprising: Durham, the Indianapolis businessman who purchased the Akron, Ohio, finance company eight years ago, is cooperating with attorneys in Fair’s 4-month-old bankruptcy case. He’s facing up to the reality he owes the company a bundle and is shoveling over assets.

“He acknowledges he has an outstanding loan and is turning over property and proceeds [from asset sales] toward reducing those obligations,” said Kelly Burgan, a Cleveland attorney representing the trustee overseeing the company’s liquidation.

Those include prized Peter Max paintings that adorned his Geist Reservoir mansion. He already has turned over some artwork to the bankruptcy trustee and plans to turn over more, setting the stage for a court-supervised auction.

Durham, who has spent most of his time in California since FBI agents raided company offices two days before Thanksgiving, recently put the 10,000-square-foot Geist home on the block for $5.5 million. And he’s been selling off his exotic car collection, which exceeded 30 vehicles at its peak.

Yet the company’s 5,000 investors—all Ohio residents, many elderly and living on modest incomes—are unlikely to receive a big slice of the $200 million they’re owed, at least anytime soon.

Here’s the harsh reality: Some of Durham’s most valuable assets have first liens against them, denting the amount that might ultimately flow to Fair. The home, for instance, serves as collateral on a $1.9 million line of credit from Shelby County Bank. Assuming the house fetched the asking price—a fanciful thought in this slumping market—Fair gets a few million.

And the professionals in bankruptcy court who’ve launched an assault on Durham’s assets aren’t doing charity work. Their fees are sure to run into the millions of dollars. Burgan, a partner with Cleveland’s Baker & Hostetler, bills at $400 an hour. Jay Jaffe, a Baker & Daniels partner in Indianapolis who’s helping with the case, has an hourly rate of $500. A forensic accountant and forensic computer expert each charge $250 an hour.

Records filed with securities regulators show Durham used Fair like a personal bank after buying it in 2002, with money flowing to support an ostentatious lifestyle, friends and business associates, as well as other companies he owned. The records show he withdrew tens of millions under a line of credit and that he and associates borrowed even larger sums through businesses they controlled.

Related-party loans now top $168 million and represent the primary asset available to repay investors, who purchased investment certificates with interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. But it’s far from clear how much is actually collectible, and some of the loans are poorly documented, exacerbating the challenge.

Given the realities, trustee Brian Bash, another partner at Baker & Hostetler in Cleveland, must strike a balance between being aggressive and picking his battles carefully.

“You don’t want to launch an expensive lawsuit pursuing an entity that doesn’t have any assets,” Burgan said.

Still, asset collection would be far tougher were Durham not cooperating. In one of the most significant developments, his attorneys consented to turn over all the assets of two related firms that borrowed from Fair and then loaned to insiders—a move that eases the way for the trustee to chase down some of the biggest borrowers.

“I think there will be recoveries made, and there are already things starting to fall into place,” said David Mucklow, a Green, Ohio, attorney hired as special litigation counsel in the bankruptcy.

But no one dares estimate what the recovery might be, or how long it might take. The best Mucklow would do was call the expected recovery “substantial.”

Silent on strategy

Why the 47-year-old Durham chose to cooperate is sheer speculation, since his attorney, Gary Sallee of Indianapolis, is not returning calls. Perhaps Durham feels for investors. Or he could be positioning himself for favorable treatment by the Justice Department—which for months has been investigating whether he operated Fair as a Ponzi scheme, selling new investment certificates to pay off prior purchasers.

But this much is clear: His acknowledgment of debts doesn’t mean he’s acknowledging wrongdoing. In a filing early this year, his attorneys said offering circulars provided to prospective investors included an abundance of information disclosing the potential risks. That their bets ultimately soured goes with the territory, the filing suggested.

Buyers “assumed the risk of purchasing unsecured investments,” it said.•


  • Sound Familiar?
    Where have we heard this story before?

  • Greg will sleep just fine
    Greg Andrews is just writing a news story.He was the only one to stay on the case.What would comments do to alter the resolution of this whole situation? Tim got to party and live large now the tab is due.
  • this case
    he'll never be charged with a crime. he's an intelligent thief, what he's keeping is so far hidden it won't be found. nowdays with everything being searched and recorded by p/c, makes stealing and hiding easier.
  • Brizzi
    Carl Brizzi, is that you? Are you enjoying your last moments as a free man? Or are you more worried that your lifestyle is in transition.
  • Who is REALLY to blame?
    Hmmm, when this non-story was first published, and every tiny detail posted as though it was really newsworthy, the green eyed monster of wealth envy reared its ugly head and a chain reaction was set into motion. Comments and wild speculations ran rampant, accusations and "predictions" were posted that had nothing to do with the facts at all. The real victims truly ARE the investors, but whose fault is that? Fair Finance is history. The company was forced to file bankruptcy because an INVESTMENT company needs something to invest... hmmm perhaps Mr. Greg Andrews is the one who should be losing sleep.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.