IBJNews

E&A buttered by $125M sale of Udi's to Smart Balance

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis investment firm E&A Industries is cashing out of its majority stake in Udi’s Healthy Foods LLC by selling the Denver-based food company to margarine maker Smart Balance Inc. for $125 million.

The acquisition was announced Thursday.

E&A’s principals include Al Hubbard, a former economic policy advisor to President George W. Bush.

Another is Devin Anderson, who led E&A’s 1997 acquisition of Indianapolis-based fine-toiletries maker Gilchrist & Soames. Anderson has been Udi’s CEO since E&A bought a majority stake in 2010.

“I have been running the business day to day and commuting to Colorado for the past two years,” Anderson said Friday morning, as he was driving to Udi’s Denver headquarters to outline the deal to employees.

Udi’s has grown quickly, with expected annual sales of $72.4 million this year, compared with $4.3 million in 2009.

Udi’s was E&A’s first investment in the food industry. The company's niche is gluten-free products such as bread and pizza.

“We had fresh eyes in the food industry,” Anderson said. "I think that was helpful. We tried things the food veterans told us didn’t make sense."

Among them was a marketing focus heavy on social media. Udi’s has more than 750,000 fans on Facebook and adds 1,000 to 2,000 more fans each day, said Anderson.

Initially, Udi’s focused on serving consumers who had a gluten intolerance and could no longer eat bread products. More recently, it broadened its appeal to consumers seeking healthier food products.

It’s unclear exactly how much E&A will reap from the deal. Holding a minority stake in Udi’s is founder Udi Bar-on.

Anderson said Paramus, N.J.-based Smart Balance has similar corporate vision and growth objectives. In addition to margarine, the publicly traded company makes microwave popcorn and peanut butter. The company earned $3.7 million in its latest quarter on revenue of $79.3 million.

E&A’s other holdings over the years have included Car Brite, which makes automotive cleaning products. It sold that firm in 2005, and sold Gilchrest & Soames in 2007.

Current holdings include Ontario, Calif.-based Ultra Solutions, which provides ultrasound and echocardiography machines; and Northbrook, Ill.-based Con-Tech Lighting, a distributor of lighting products.

E&A shops for companies in the $2 million to $20 million revenue range. Candidates tend to reside in niche and specialty markets that are sales- and marketing-driven.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT