EDITORIAL: Education bills rise above legislative noise

 IBJ Staff
April 30, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

In a legislative session that saw puzzling attempts to move the state backward on issues such as smoking cessation and public transportation, the success of Gov. Mitch Daniels’ education agenda stands out as a bold step forward.

Reasonable people can disagree on whether such tools as merit pay for teachers and private school vouchers will have the intended effect, but there’s almost unanimous agreement that the status quo in education isn’t working.

The governor’s legislative victories at least—and at last—provide a variety of tools that can be used in an attempt to boost student achievement.

The most common-sense tool is merit pay for teachers. Teachers, like other working folks, should be eligible for higher pay tied to meritorious performance.

The merit pay law doesn’t eliminate all obstacles standing between good teachers and better pay. Local school districts can squander the opportunity if they do a poor job of setting up—and administering—methods for teacher evaluation. We hope the administration of Indianapolis Public Schools, which isn’t known for its openness or effectiveness, gets this one right. IPS’ best teachers surely deserve to be rewarded for succeeding under difficult circumstances.

Adding to the challenge, schools in urban districts such as IPS often see huge turnover in their student population from one year to the next. That makes it difficult to measure achievement and evaluate teachers.

None of this destroys the broader argument for merit pay. Teachers deserve incentives, even in a profession where the richest reward is the satisfaction that comes from seeing a student succeed.

The governor’s other big education victories—an expansion of charter schools and a private school voucher program—are controversial but will give families more educational choice.

Charter schools—public schools that operate free of much of the bureaucracy that weighs down traditional public schools—count among their ranks some of the most innovative schools in the city. We’re all for creating more of them, provided they are held accountable according to the performance measures spelled out in their charters.

And we like the provision in the new charter law that would allow charters to buy surplus public school buildings at a discount. IPS, in particular, has a history of closing schools without any regard for the blight an empty building can create.

Among the governor’s legislative successes, we are least supportive of vouchers, especially the provision that would allow families to use public money to attend private, religious schools. We are not, however, offended by the basic concept of vouchers. Parents who live in struggling districts need options for their children.

If only all parents were as involved as the ones who will surely take advantage of this new opportunity. Parents who fail their children by not participating in the education of their children remain our biggest concern.

Absent a remedy for that complex problem, the reforms the governor asked for and received make sense. Even those who fought the reforms should hope they work.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.