IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Time is right for justice center

IBJ Staff
December 21, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Finally, the city is talking seriously about consolidating the jumble of courts, jails and public offices that compose its criminal justice system and plunking them in a new facility—a sprawling blockhouse with an estimated cost of $200 million to $400 million.

Motivated by upcoming lease expirations in downtown office buildings, Mayor Ballard’s announcement Dec. 11 that he would push for the project is the right decision at an opportune time.

And a good opportunity to break with his secretive ways and open the process to the public.

The three intervening decades since the notion of a criminal justice center was first broached have not been kind to the system. Courts and jails have grown crowded, with public servants trying to prevent victims, witnesses and the accused from unexpectedly bumping into one another.

The system also is inefficient. Prisoners must be hauled back and forth from the jails to the courts, and prosecutors and public defenders toil in nearby office buildings, costing the city rent.

Meanwhile, the property beneath the jails has come into demand for redevelopment. The southeast quadrant of the downtown still has more than its share of parking lots and crummy buildings—in large part because few people and businesses want to locate close to jails. Remove the jails, and the private sector will come up with projects that bring the laggard area into visual and economic parity with the rest of downtown.

It’s apparent that this project is as necessary as the $754 million Eskenazi Health hospital that opened Dec. 7.

Ballard’s proposal for forging a public-private partnership with a developer that would build and maintain the facility holds potential for keeping costs in line. City officials have not decided where to put the facility, but say a location near Indianapolis International Airport might fit the bill.

It’s the details—or rather whether Ballard will raise the curtain on the details before a deal is done—that raise the greatest concern.

Nearly two years into his second term, Ballard has made too many big development decisions behind closed doors. Most recently, he announced a developer for the Market Square Arena site with little input from the public.

If Ballard and the City-County Council opt for a public-private partnership on the justice center, they can increase confidence in the decision by insisting on openness from beginning to end.

The Wishard hospital referendum passed in 2009 with a whopping 85-percent majority. Citizens are willing to spend on public facilities when it can be shown to make sense.

The need for a criminal justice complex is growing. Leases are expiring. Key downtown properties are ripe for redevelopment. Interest rates are low. Companies with expertise would likely be interested in helping.

Good for Ballard for showing leadership. For the sake of the best possible outcome, he needs to push ahead in the open.•

Send comments on this editorial to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT