Election map aids Indiana GOP grip on House seats

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Democrats don't expect their election prospects to improve soon after Republicans drew election maps that led to the GOP picking up two U.S. congressional seats in 2012.

The 2011 redistricting marked the first time in decades that Republicans controlled the redistricting process, as they dominated the state House and Senate and hold the governorship. In 1991 and 2001, Democrats held the Indiana House, giving them a say in the Congressional maps.

Republicans took once-sprawling districts and made them more compact, reducing the potential for competitive U.S. House races. Those moves, plus Democratic Rep. Joe Donnelly's decision to run for U.S. Senate, resulted in Democrats losing their 5-4 edge in the Indiana congressional delegation as Republicans claimed seven of the state's nine seats in 2012.

Andy Downs, director of the Mike Downs Center for Politics at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, pointed to the movement of heavily Republican areas such as Kosciusko County from the Republican-strong 3rd District to the more-balanced 2nd District as key changes that helped GOP candidates.

"I think it is safe to say that the redistricting benefited the Republicans in 2012," he said. "When districts are competitive, small shifts can make the difference."

Under the old Democrat-drawn maps, the 5th and 4th Districts made strange contortions to encapsulate more Republican voters, while the 9th District was drawn in such a way to capture conservative Democrats along the Ohio River and stretched to Bloomington to capture a pocket of liberal Democrats.

The new maps concentrate Democrats in northwestern Indiana's 1st District, where Rep. Pete Visclosky has served 15 terms, and in the heart of Indianapolis, where 7th District Rep. Andre Carson is in his third full term after succeeding his grandmother, longtime Rep. Julia Carson, who died in 2007.

Senate Democratic Leader Tim Lanane, D-Anderson, has advocated for a commission to study the redistricting process before the next maps are drawn in 2021. House Republican leaders also crafted a similar measure that would have appointed a committee to hold public hearings and craft a map with better input.

Neither measure gained traction in the Republican-led Senate, frustrating Democrats.

"I just think as long as the maps are drawn by the people who will run in those maps, it seems like politics is going to endure," Lanane said.

For now, Democrats' best hope of winning back a seat lies in the 2nd District, which used to be held by Donnelly.

In 2008, when Democrat Barack Obama pulled out a surprising presidential victory in Indiana, voters in the 2nd District chose him over Republican John McCain by 9.4 percentage points. But in 2012, Republican Mitt Romney beat Obama by 14 percentage points in the redrawn district, and Republican Jackie Walorski won a narrow victory.

Democratic candidate Joe Bock, a Notre Dame professor and former Missouri state lawmaker, has drawn support from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. But the makeup of the new district is still strongly Republican, favoring incumbent Walorski in the 2014 election.


  • It's the same thing
    both parties have drawn districts to benefit their interests no matter what you call it...as Indyman says, who is neutral to do the job better? Funny that both sides have had their chance at complaining, both have drawn legislation, and it gets no traction...of course it doesn't...most people in one camp or another don't want change, they just one to be the party in power so they can "put it to" the other side...so it ever shall be...
  • comment
    Compacting sounds good to me. About time
  • So the democrats are complaining because the republicans eliminated the old gerrymandering and made the districts more compact and regional? Oh my goodness, how dare they? To me it should not be about what party you are in, but what region. Someone in rural putnam county has little in common with someone from inner city Indy. It is tough for a politician to represent folks from very different areas. I agree that neither republicans or democrats should draw the maps, but where do you find neutral folks to do it?
  • Great news
    and now cue even more complaining, especially from Italiano....

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.