IBJNews

Emergency hearing scheduled for Premier

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
A U.S. bankruptcy judge has scheduled an emergency hearing over Premier Properties USA Inc.'s refusal to turn over records concerning its retail properties including Metropolis mall in Plainfield.

The April 28 hearing will address a request by affiliates of Atlanta-based Dominion Capital Management LLC, one of Premier's largest lenders. Dominion took control of Metropolis and most of Premier's other properties earlier this month.

The filing says Metropolis is "operating without appropriate security or utility services" since Premier has not allowed the new property managers access to the mall's offices or its books. It also cites concerns at other Premier properties, including The Marquis in Virginia, Current in Florida and The Foundry in Pennsylvania - a building under "severe structural distress."

Premier filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 23, narrowly avoiding the appointment of a receiver to take control of the troubled company.

Premier and its founder, Christopher P. White, face numerous lawsuits alleging unpaid bills, defaulted loans and check fraud - trouble that began to mount last year as credit-market turmoil put a stop to easy credit.

In a Chapter 11 filing, the firm that developed Metropolis mall in Plainfield listed 20 creditors owed a total of more than $2.8 million. It did not include millions of dollars in unpaid bills connected to specific properties - including Metropolis, Plainfield Commons and several malls in other states - that the company no longer controls.

Premier has not provided a list of its own assets, although the filing says the total will range between $1 million and $10 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT