IBJNews

Emmis reports smaller annual loss on higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Emmis Communications Corp. on Tuesday reported a smaller loss and higher revenue in its latest fiscal year, attributing its improving financial condition to a recovering economy.

For its fiscal year ended Feb. 28, Emmis suffered a loss of $25.2 million, or 67 cents per share, compared with a loss of $131.7 million, or $3.56 per share, in the previous fiscal year.

Revenue from the company’s radio operations grew 4.3 percent, to $185.2 million, helping overall revenue rise 3.6 percent from the previous year, to $251.3 million.

Emmis owns 23 radio stations in seven U.S. markets and publishes seven U.S. magazines, in addition to operating radio networks in Bulgaria and Slovakia.

“Radio net revenues increased principally as a result of general economic growth in our domestic radio markets as the economy recovers from the recent recession,” the company said in its annual report.

Still, Emmis continues to contend with a heavy debt load that totaled $331 million as of Feb. 28. The company received a bit of relief in late March, when it reached an agreement with one of its largest lenders, Canyon Capital Advisors LLC in Los Angeles, to extend the maturity date on $182.9 million in senior bank debt for an additional year—from November 2013 to November 2014.

In a letter to employees at the time, Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan said the move gave the company additional flexibility to operate more effectively. “It means that Emmis is on more solid footing than we were just a few days ago,” he said. “We need you to continue focusing on working hard and bringing our business back. We’ve seen remarkable trends in the last few months, and I know we can continue the momentum.”

The company, however, acknowledged in its annual report that it could default on the loans if it cannot comply with the financial agreements. The large amount of debt continues to weigh on Emmis following Smulyan’s attempt last year to take the company private.

Emmis announced in May 2010 a $90 million buyout bid by JS Acquisition LLC, a private company formed by Smulyan. A group of preferred shareholders blocked the deal, and Smulyan’s financial backer, New York-based Alden Global Capital, backed out of an “agreement in principle” to sweeten the terms for the preferred shareholders.

The failed attempt to take Emmis private has resulted in three lawsuits, the latest filed in March by Emmis in a federal court in New York.

Emmis shares rose 2 cents in early trading Tuesday, to $1.06 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT