IBJNews

Emmis reports smaller annual loss on higher revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Emmis Communications Corp. on Tuesday reported a smaller loss and higher revenue in its latest fiscal year, attributing its improving financial condition to a recovering economy.

For its fiscal year ended Feb. 28, Emmis suffered a loss of $25.2 million, or 67 cents per share, compared with a loss of $131.7 million, or $3.56 per share, in the previous fiscal year.

Revenue from the company’s radio operations grew 4.3 percent, to $185.2 million, helping overall revenue rise 3.6 percent from the previous year, to $251.3 million.

Emmis owns 23 radio stations in seven U.S. markets and publishes seven U.S. magazines, in addition to operating radio networks in Bulgaria and Slovakia.

“Radio net revenues increased principally as a result of general economic growth in our domestic radio markets as the economy recovers from the recent recession,” the company said in its annual report.

Still, Emmis continues to contend with a heavy debt load that totaled $331 million as of Feb. 28. The company received a bit of relief in late March, when it reached an agreement with one of its largest lenders, Canyon Capital Advisors LLC in Los Angeles, to extend the maturity date on $182.9 million in senior bank debt for an additional year—from November 2013 to November 2014.

In a letter to employees at the time, Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan said the move gave the company additional flexibility to operate more effectively. “It means that Emmis is on more solid footing than we were just a few days ago,” he said. “We need you to continue focusing on working hard and bringing our business back. We’ve seen remarkable trends in the last few months, and I know we can continue the momentum.”

The company, however, acknowledged in its annual report that it could default on the loans if it cannot comply with the financial agreements. The large amount of debt continues to weigh on Emmis following Smulyan’s attempt last year to take the company private.

Emmis announced in May 2010 a $90 million buyout bid by JS Acquisition LLC, a private company formed by Smulyan. A group of preferred shareholders blocked the deal, and Smulyan’s financial backer, New York-based Alden Global Capital, backed out of an “agreement in principle” to sweeten the terms for the preferred shareholders.

The failed attempt to take Emmis private has resulted in three lawsuits, the latest filed in March by Emmis in a federal court in New York.

Emmis shares rose 2 cents in early trading Tuesday, to $1.06 each.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT