IBJNews

Emmis gets additional year to repay debt

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Emmis Communications Corp. has received a much-needed extension to repay a mountain of debt the Indianapolis-based media company owes one of its largest lenders.

Emmis announced late Tuesday that it had reached an agreement with Canyon Capital Advisors LLC in Los Angeles to extend the maturity date on $182.9 million in senior bank debt for an additional year—from November 2013 to November 2014.

The amount Emmis owes Canyon Capital is part of the company’s overall debt total of $329 million.

In a letter to employees, Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan said the move gives the company additional flexibility to operate more effectively.

“It means that Emmis is on more solid footing than we were just a few days ago,” he said. “We need you to continue focusing on working hard and bringing our business back. We’ve seen remarkable trends in the last few months, and I know we can continue the momentum.”

The agreement that Emmis reached with Canyon Capital also allows the company to waive a requirement that its audits be certified for fiscal 2011 and 2012.  

Wall Street initially reacted favorably to the agreement, as the price of Emmis shares early Wednesday morning increased 2 cents, to $1.06 each.

The large amount of debt continues to weigh on Emmis following Smulyan’s attempt last year to take the company private.

Emmis announced in May the $90 million buyout bid by JS Acquisition LLC, a private company formed by Smulyan to complete the purchase. A group of preferred shareholders blocked the deal, and Smulyan’s financial backer, New York-based Alden Global Capital, backed out of an “agreement in principle” to sweeten the terms for the preferred shareholders.

The failed attempt to take Emmis private has resulted in three lawsuits, the latest filed earlier this month by Emmis in a federal court in New York.

Meanwhile, to raise cash, Emmis already has a deal pending to sell one of its Los Angeles stations to Mexico’s Grupo Radio Centro for $110 million. It also has quietly floated the idea of selling WLUP-FM and WKQX-FM in Chicago and WRXP-FM in New York—stations “where we believe the sale value could exceed the prospects for cash-flow generation as part of our portfolio,” Emmis said in a 2010 regulatory filing.

The company has yet to release earnings for its latest fiscal year, which ended Feb. 28.  In the fiscal year ended Feb. 28, 2010, Emmis reported radio revenue of $178 million—down 27 percent from the $244 million reported two years earlier.

In the fiscal third quarter ended Nov. 30, Emmis lost $1.6 million on revenue of $66.5 million.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in several cities, including Indianapolis Monthly.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT