IBJNews

Employees sue Finish Line over manager's secret camera use

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based The Finish Line Inc. is facing a lawsuit in California after one of its former managers secretly installed a camera in an employee bathroom and store dressing room.

Five female employees, whose ages ranged from 17 to 21 at the time, are seeking unspecified damages from the retail chain and the ex-manager, David Meyer.

Meyer, who started out managing Finish Line stores in Indiana, was manager of the Milpitas, Calif., store from 2006 to February 2010. He made the recordings in late 2009 and early last year, but they weren’t discovered on his personal computer until March, according to the women’s lawsuit, which was filed in August in U.S. District Court of northern California.

It’s not clear who discovered the videos, and Meyer, who now resides in Warsaw in northern Indiana, doesn’t appear to be facing criminal charges.

Meyer, who is representing himself, filed a response in which he admits to placing hidden cameras in the employee bathroom and the dressing room on multiple occasions between December 2009 and April 2010.

Meyer said he used the cameras to “identify who was flushing harmful items down the toilet.”

Indianapolis-based Finish Line sought help with legal costs from its insurer under its general liability policy after the suit was filed, but Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. denied the claim. Now Liberty Mutual is asking the U.S. District Court of southern Indiana to issue a declaration confirming that its denial is appropriate.

Finish Line might be able to settle the case out of court. The company’s lawyers have asked the California judge to force the women into private arbitration.

As part of their job applications, the women signed an agreement stating “parties shall have no right to litigate a dispute in any other forum,” Finish Line notes.

Finish Line spokeswoman Anne Roman said she couldn’t comment on ongoing litigation, but the company has issued a statement saying it had nothing to do with Meyer’s behavior.

The situation was “isolated to an ex-employee that has not worked for the company in nearly two years and whose alleged actions were neither known to nor in any way condoned by the company,” the statement said. "The safety and security of our employees is a top priority at Finish Line.”

Finish Line operates about 650 athletic apparel and footwear stores across the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Gimme a Break
    And what harmful items does Meyer think they were flushing in the dressing rooms??????? What a creepy thing to do.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT