IBJNews

Employers want cake, and to eat it, too

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Employers are still trying to get their arms around what the new health insurance law will mean for them. But on the eve of the law’s passage last month, a survey by Indianapolis-based United Benefit Advisors LLC showed employers as a group had no hope the law would reduce their costs—but also no coherent plan for reforming the current system.

Of the 1,500 U.S. employers surveyed, 52 percent expect the new law to raise health care costs faster than present trends. Another 20 percent think it will keep costs rising as fast as they have been.

Only 28 percent think the new law will slow the growth or reduce the cost of health care.

Employers seem to want to have things both ways, according to United Benefit Advisors' summary of the survey results. Although employers think the new law will make the cost situation worse, only 11 percent of employers supported the new law’s most obvious cost-saving measure: the taxation of expensive, “Cadillac” health insurance plans.

Another example of employers’ conflicting desires is that they want requirements for health insurers to take all comers, but no requirements for individuals or employers to buy health coverage.

A whopping 71 percent approved of the law’s ban against health insurers declining coverage to people with pre-existing conditions. Yet only 27 percent of employers supported the new law’s mandate on employers with 50 or more workers to provide insurance coverage. Even fewer, 21 percent, supported the bill’s tax penalties on individuals who don’t buy health insurance.

Of course, if employers’ demands had been enshrined in law, health insurers have warned they would be flooded by people with illnesses—knowing they cannot be turned away—and shunned by people in good health, who know they can wait to buy insurance until they’re actually sick. The result would be skyrocketing insurance costs.

Health insurers fear a similar result with the new health insurance law because the taxes that will be levied on people who don’t buy health coverage are, in their view, too small to be very effective.

"Employers want to be assured that their employees and their families have protection against the financial burdens caused as a result of having no or inadequate health care, pre-existing conditions and loss of coverage," wrote the United Benefit Advisors staff in a summary of the survey's findings. "Yet, at the same time, they do not support individual mandates for coverage with or without tax incentives/subsidies."
 
The survey was conducted online in February and early March. President Obama signed health insurance reform into law on March 23 and some amendments a few days later.

United Benefit Advisors is a network of benefits brokers and consultants around the country. It has more than 140 member firms, who represent nearly 40,000 employers in North America and the United Kingdom.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT