IBJNews

Endocyte's $86M IPO plan a boon for Indiana, investors

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Greg Andrews

Endocyte Inc. has zero sales and a work force of just 54. But the fledgling life sciences firm may end up as one of Indiana’s most powerful economic engines of the 21st century.

Or at least that’s what many of the leaders of Indiana’s life sciences and entrepreneurial communities have been hoping for years. And now that the cancer-fighting West Lafayette firm has filed for an $86 million initial public offering, that reality seems tantalizingly close.

A successful IPO would be huge on many levels.

For the state of Indiana, it would help validate key parts of its economic-development strategy. From 2001 through 2004, the company received a total of $4 million in grants from the state’s 21st Century Research and Technology Fund—money that helped sustain it at a crucial time and drew in tens of millions of dollars more in venture capital.

Endocyte also demonstrates the potential payoff from the state’s push to transfer promising new technologies from academic laboratories to startup companies. Philip Low, a Purdue University chemistry professor who serves as Endocyte’s chief science officer, led the research team that developed the company’s treatment—an approach that delivers high doses of cancer drugs to diseased cells while leaving healthy cells untouched.

Venture capitalists in Indiana and nationally have thrown money at the company with abandon. Local investors include CID Capital, Clarian Health Ventures and the Indiana Future Fund.

The life sciences initiative BioCrossroads launched the Future Fund in 2003, raising $73 million from the Public Employees’ Retirement Fund, Ball State University, OneAmerica, WellPoint Inc. and others. The money then flowed to six venture capital firms, including San Francisco-based Burrill & Co., which became one of Endocyte’s biggest investors.

An even larger investor is the pension fund of the Indianapolis-based Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Endocyte’s IPO filing, submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission Aug. 17, said the fund invested more than $10.3 million and holds a 15-percent stake. Pension fund President James Hamlett declined to comment, citing regulatory restrictions while an IPO is pending.

P. Ron Ellis, Endocyte’s CEO, also declined to comment, citing the same restrictions.

The company’s 150-page IPO filing, however, tells an intriguing story—one of a company that slugged through years of research in its quest to bring a ground-breaking treatment to market. The company operates out of 14,000 square feet at Purdue University Research Park as well as a 4,000-square-foot corporate office in Indianapolis.

Here’s how Endocyte’s technology works: The cancer-fighting drug is linked to a substance that targets receptors that are overexpressed in diseased cells relative to healthy cells. Endocyte uses companion imaging technology to identify patients who have the overexpressed receptors and thus are more likely to benefit from treatment.

It’s a powerful combination. “This targeted approach is designed to enable the treatment of patients with highly active drugs at greater doses, delivered more frequently, and over longer periods of time than would be possible with the untargeted drug alone,” Endocyte says in its filing.

Endocyte now is on the cusp of commercialization. In early 2011, it expects to begin enrollment in a phase-three trial for an extremely difficult-to-treat form of ovarian cancer. Women receiving the treatment in a phase 2 trial saw a 105-percent improvement in progression-free survival compared with women receiving the standard therapy.

The company also is working on other treatments, including one for non-small-cell lung cancer that has completed a phase two trial.

For now, however, Endocyte is piling up massive losses, burning through the more than $90 million in private investment it’s raised since forming in 1995. Over just the past three years, losses have totaled $49 million. And there’s no guarantee of ultimate success, said David Menlow, president of IPOfinancial.com in Millburn, N.J.

He said life sciences firms often go public before their products have won U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Some ultimately succeed spectacularly, he said, while others flame out. Some investors stay on the sidelines “because they don’t feel like buying lottery tickets,” he said.

Yet economic development leaders are focusing on the upside—and what Endocyte’s long-term success would mean for efforts to cast Indiana as a hotbed for life sciences entrepreneurism.

“For us, as this moves ahead, it is proof of concept that Indiana companies can go the distance,” said David Johnson, CEO of BioCrossroads.

And—oh, yeah—there’s the potential benefit to humanity, too.

“The product itself has the promise of saving tens of thousands if not millions of lives in this country and around the world,” said Mitch Roob, Indiana’s secretary of commerce.•


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT