IBJNews

Ener1 stock takes beating after Think write-down

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

The stock market has punished battery maker Ener1 since executives revealed a $73 million write-down on its stake in Think, the electric car company.

Shares of Ener1 hit a new 52-week low of $1.42 before closing at $1.52 on May 13.

The company reported on May 10 a first-quarter loss of $84.7 million. Net sales were $23.1 million, up 110 percent from the year-ago quarter.

Ener1, which engineers and builds its lithium-ion batteries in the Indianapolis area, is the exclusive supplier for Think, a privately held Norwegian company that began assembling its City car in Elkhart last year. Ener1 also became one of Think’s key financial backers.
 

OTB manufacturing Ener1, the parent company of Indianapolis battery maker EnerDel, wrote off its investment in Think, an electric car. (IBJ File Photo)

“Think faces the need to recapitalize its go-forward business plan,” Ener1 CEO Charles Gassenheimer said during a conference call. “While Think faces this challenge, Ener1 will be guided by two principles: No additional funds will be provided to Think by Ener1, and Ener1 will try to avoid consolidating or increasing its equity exposure to Think.”

Most of Ener1’s first-quarter loss was a $59.4 impairment charge on Think equity. Ener1 wrote down another $13.9 million on financial instruments, “primarily as a result of the impairment charge.”

The total write-off was $73.3 million.

Gassenheimer said Ener1 decided to write down its equity position because of Think’s inability to raise additional capital and its longer-than-expected delay in re-starting operations.

Ener1 halted battery production for Think earlier this year because the carmaker needed to work through a backlog. The stoppage contributed to Ener1’s layoffs in March, which affected 3 percent of 770 employees worldwide. (The number of people laid off at offices in Indianapolis and a Mount Comfort manufacturing plant were not disclosed.)

Ener1 realized last year that its business wouldn’t survive on selling to the electric car market, and it has shifted its emphasis to electric utilities and heavy-duty vehicles.

Gassenheimer reassured investors that Ener1 has the resources to finance the rest of its business plan. He expects Ener1 to post positive EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT