IBJNews

Ener1 stock takes beating after Think write-down

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

The stock market has punished battery maker Ener1 since executives revealed a $73 million write-down on its stake in Think, the electric car company.

Shares of Ener1 hit a new 52-week low of $1.42 before closing at $1.52 on May 13.

The company reported on May 10 a first-quarter loss of $84.7 million. Net sales were $23.1 million, up 110 percent from the year-ago quarter.

Ener1, which engineers and builds its lithium-ion batteries in the Indianapolis area, is the exclusive supplier for Think, a privately held Norwegian company that began assembling its City car in Elkhart last year. Ener1 also became one of Think’s key financial backers.
 

OTB manufacturing Ener1, the parent company of Indianapolis battery maker EnerDel, wrote off its investment in Think, an electric car. (IBJ File Photo)

“Think faces the need to recapitalize its go-forward business plan,” Ener1 CEO Charles Gassenheimer said during a conference call. “While Think faces this challenge, Ener1 will be guided by two principles: No additional funds will be provided to Think by Ener1, and Ener1 will try to avoid consolidating or increasing its equity exposure to Think.”

Most of Ener1’s first-quarter loss was a $59.4 impairment charge on Think equity. Ener1 wrote down another $13.9 million on financial instruments, “primarily as a result of the impairment charge.”

The total write-off was $73.3 million.

Gassenheimer said Ener1 decided to write down its equity position because of Think’s inability to raise additional capital and its longer-than-expected delay in re-starting operations.

Ener1 halted battery production for Think earlier this year because the carmaker needed to work through a backlog. The stoppage contributed to Ener1’s layoffs in March, which affected 3 percent of 770 employees worldwide. (The number of people laid off at offices in Indianapolis and a Mount Comfort manufacturing plant were not disclosed.)

Ener1 realized last year that its business wouldn’t survive on selling to the electric car market, and it has shifted its emphasis to electric utilities and heavy-duty vehicles.

Gassenheimer reassured investors that Ener1 has the resources to finance the rest of its business plan. He expects Ener1 to post positive EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT