EnerDel forms joint venture with Chinese autoparts maker

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lithium-ion battery maker EnerDel announced Thursday that it will enter a joint venture with Wanxiang, the largest auto-parts producer in China.

Charles Gassenheimer, CEO of EnerDel parent Ener1 Inc., said EnerDel will bring the partnership “generation two” technology. Wanxiang already makes lithium-ion cells and battery packs for China’s nascent electric bus market.

Gassenheimer said EnerDel would contribute engineering and production know-how, help with the continuing build-out of Wanxiang’s Chinese plant and help address the company’s backlog of orders.

“So this is a huge business accelerator for both of us,” he said of the joint venture, which has not been named.

Work created for EnerDel in Indiana will be product engineering and manufacturing engineering of battery packs, Gassenheimer said. He did not say how many Indiana jobs would result directly from the Chinese partnership.

EnerDel in January said it would create 1,400 jobs in Indiana over the next several years, mostly at a new production plant in Axcess 70 industrial park in Hancock County. EnerDel is headquartered on the northwest side on Hague Road, where about 200 of its 260 employees and independent contractors work. It also has a facility in Noblesville.

Ener1 is publicly traded and based in New York.

An Indiana Economic Development Corp. news release said the joint venture eventually could boost EnerDel’s local employment to 3,000. But Gassenheimer said he always expected the number to be 3,000. However, he offered no date when the target would be achieved.

Wanxiang is China's largest auto parts supplier and second-largest private (non-state-owned) company, with more than $10 billion in annual revenue and 30,000 employees, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. said. According to the IEDC statement, its electric vehicle division expects to produce 2,000 powertrain and battery pack systems in 2010 for use in cars, buses and commercial utility vehicles.

Wanxiang already has an electric-vehicle division. Its hybrid and pure-electric buses are running in the Shanghai Expo, said Guogjang Yang, the Chinese Consul General in Chicago.

In addition, Wanxiang is the second-largest stakeholder in Guangzhou Automobile, which has joint ventures with Honda, Toyota and Fiat. Wanxiang's customers include SAIC, Guangzhou Automobile, Chana, Haima and Yutong, the second-largest bus company in the world.

"EnerDel brings excellent technology and experience that are in high demand in China's car and truck industries," said Pingyi Li, deputy general manager of Department of Development, Wanxiang Group, and executive director of Wanxiang Electric Vehicle Co. LTD. "Working together, we see tremendous opportunity to serve this growing market, and we are proud to have them as our partner."

EnerDel has landed a $118 million federal grant and expects to receive a Department of Energy loan for $250 million to $300 million. The company also is in line for $21 million in tax credits from the state of Indiana because it chose to build its first full-scale battery production facility in Hancock County

EnerDel formed in 1994 via the merger of the lithium-battery operations of Ener1 and Michigan-based Delphi Corp.


  • EnerDel is headquartered
    EnerDel is headquartered on the NORTHEAST SIDE (Castleton) not Northwest Side...

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.