IBJNews

Equity firm withdraws support for revised Emmis deal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The private equity firm backing Emmis Communications Corp. CEO Jeff Smulyan’s efforts to take his company private delivered a serious blow to the potential deal on Monday, saying it no longer supports a compromise negotiated with a group of preferred shareholders that had been blocking the deal.

Emmis said in a press release Monday that Emmis, Smulyan's JS Acquisition,  the preferred-shareholder group and the private equity firm—Alden Global Capital— had reached an "agreement in principle" revising terms of the deal. But the broadcasting company said that after the parties achieved that breakthrough, Alden withdrew its support.

The deal has been in jeopardy for weeks. On Friday, Smulyan failed for a fifth time to sway a group of preferred shareholders to vote in favor of of the original deal. Under that agreement, which valued Emmis at about $90 million, common shareholders would receive $2.40 for each of their shares. The company did not reveal terms of the revised deal that Alden has decided not to support.

Discussions are continuing, Emmis said a release. But because of Alden's decision, "JS Acquisition believes it is unlikely that an agreement will be reached with either Alden or the group of holders of Preferred Stock."

“We thought we had a deal; Alden reconsidered—you’ll have to ask them why,” Emmis spokeswoman Kate Snedeker said in an e-mailed statement. “Alden has communicated to us that they are having internal meetings related to the transaction this week.”

The preferred shareholders who banded together to oppose the original deal hold hold 38 percent of Emmis preferred shares. The deal requires backing of holders of at least two-thirds of the preferred shares.

Emmis said Monday that it has extended its original offer until Sept. 2, as Emmis, JS Acquisition, Alden and the preferred shareholders continue discussions in an effort to reach an agreement.

Smulyan’s proposal also requires approval from the holders of a majority of Emmis shares, a threshold he likely would be able to meet.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Indianapolis-based Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in seven cities, including Indianapolis Monthly. It also operates radio stations in Slovakia and Bulgaria.

Smulyan entered into an agreement in April to take the company private.

This is not the first time Smulyan—the company's controlling shareholder—has tried to take Emmis private.

Smulyan made an offer in May 2006 to acquire all the shares of Emmis for $15.25 per share in a deal that valued the company’s stock at $567 million. He called off the deal a few months later after he couldn’t reach terms with the board. The company later declared a special $4-per-share dividend.

Emmis shares shed nearly 10 percent of their value Monday morning, and were trading at $1.83 each.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT