IBJNews

Ex-airport CEO getting lofty departure pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Departing Indianapolis Airport Authority CEO John Clark will leave his job with a year’s salary—$270,000—plus remaining unpaid vacation days.

The airport board earlier this week declined to retain Clark as his three-year employment term neared its end, saying the decision to part ways was mutual.

Clark came under fire in recent years for making numerous overseas business trips to attend airport industry conferences.

Last year alone he submitted expense forms to the authority totaling more than $31,000. Clark said much of the travel has involved his leadership roles in Airports Council International. He used the trips to lure business to the airport, he said.

The trips included an $8,300 excursion to an ACI conference in Morocco in November and a $10,000 trip in January 2011 to meet with Comlux Aviation officials in Switzerland. Comlux has been expanding its Indianapolis aircraft refurbishment base in recent years.

Indianapolis Airport Authority Board President Mike Wells on Friday said the board was mindful of Clark’s costs in moving his family from Jacksonville, Fla., to Indianapolis three years ago as part of the rationale for the departure package.

Wells, who was recently named to the board by Mayor Greg Ballard, said he was not happy with travel costs incurred by airport authority executives under Clark’s term. The top three executives last year spent more than $67,000 on travel.

Wells said he could not point to dividends stemming from the trips such as new air service, but noted that he only recently joined the board. Wells spent 16 previous years on the board over the last two decades, including a previous term as board president.

The board Friday passed a new travel policy that requires executives to receive preauthorization for overseas trips. Wells said industry best practices can be gleaned from other methods besides travel, such as from consultants.

After the meeting, Wells said Clark arrived three years ago as the airport began to deal with a high debt load for its new terminal at a time of an economic downturn that crimped revenue.

Also, the authority a few years earlier had taken over management control from BAA, the British firm it had hired during the 1990s to manage the airport.

He called Clark a “visionary” for concepts to increase revenue and improve staff capabilities. Clark had embraced a development concept in the industry known as “aerotropolis,” which involves a carefully planned use for land radiating from an airport. He’d been seeking to get surrounding government entities to get on board the effort.

While such development groundwork has been ongoing, the economy has continued to make a slow recovery. The former passenger terminal remains undeveloped four years after it was abandoned for the new midfield terminal.

Several parcels of airport property remain undeveloped, including land near the entrance eyed for a gasoline station. Many of the airport’s aviation-related facilities remain vacant, including the air side of the U.S. Postal Service’s former Eagle Air hub.

The authority's efforts to squeeze more revenue from its property have drawn the ire of Decatur Township community leaders.

At the airport’s board meeting Friday, Decatur Township representative Pat Andrews asked the board to drop its lawsuit in Marion Superior Court aimed at stopping a private firm from building a parking facility south of the airport.

Cincinnati-based Chavez Properties won approval of the Metropolitan Development Commission last month to develop a 31-acre, 3,700-space lot at the AmeriPlex commercial development that would compete with the airport’s parking facilities.

Airport and city officials had protested the private lot, saying the AmeriPlex complex received city funding for infrastructure upgrades and that a parking lot there was not appropriate and could drain airport revenue.

Andrews told the board the airport’s battle against the private parking lot operator essentially was “un-American.”

She said the lot could provide hundreds of thousands of dollars of much-needed tax revenue to Decatur Township, which has relatively little in the way of retail and restaurants. The airport has been both a blessing and curse over the years to Decatur Township in that it is exempt from paying taxes to the township.

Airport officials thanked Andrews for her presentation but did not respond to her request to drop the lawsuit.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Obscene
    You have got to be kidding. This is obscene. Peter Drucker once said that one of the things that could undermine capitalism in this country is the spread between what executives make and what the average employee makes. If you want to help make this country better, things like this should not be allowed. I am sorry, it just isn't right. Employees get police escorts and executives get hundreds of thousands. Please stop this nonsense.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT