Ex-airport CEO getting lofty departure pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Departing Indianapolis Airport Authority CEO John Clark will leave his job with a year’s salary—$270,000—plus remaining unpaid vacation days.

The airport board earlier this week declined to retain Clark as his three-year employment term neared its end, saying the decision to part ways was mutual.

Clark came under fire in recent years for making numerous overseas business trips to attend airport industry conferences.

Last year alone he submitted expense forms to the authority totaling more than $31,000. Clark said much of the travel has involved his leadership roles in Airports Council International. He used the trips to lure business to the airport, he said.

The trips included an $8,300 excursion to an ACI conference in Morocco in November and a $10,000 trip in January 2011 to meet with Comlux Aviation officials in Switzerland. Comlux has been expanding its Indianapolis aircraft refurbishment base in recent years.

Indianapolis Airport Authority Board President Mike Wells on Friday said the board was mindful of Clark’s costs in moving his family from Jacksonville, Fla., to Indianapolis three years ago as part of the rationale for the departure package.

Wells, who was recently named to the board by Mayor Greg Ballard, said he was not happy with travel costs incurred by airport authority executives under Clark’s term. The top three executives last year spent more than $67,000 on travel.

Wells said he could not point to dividends stemming from the trips such as new air service, but noted that he only recently joined the board. Wells spent 16 previous years on the board over the last two decades, including a previous term as board president.

The board Friday passed a new travel policy that requires executives to receive preauthorization for overseas trips. Wells said industry best practices can be gleaned from other methods besides travel, such as from consultants.

After the meeting, Wells said Clark arrived three years ago as the airport began to deal with a high debt load for its new terminal at a time of an economic downturn that crimped revenue.

Also, the authority a few years earlier had taken over management control from BAA, the British firm it had hired during the 1990s to manage the airport.

He called Clark a “visionary” for concepts to increase revenue and improve staff capabilities. Clark had embraced a development concept in the industry known as “aerotropolis,” which involves a carefully planned use for land radiating from an airport. He’d been seeking to get surrounding government entities to get on board the effort.

While such development groundwork has been ongoing, the economy has continued to make a slow recovery. The former passenger terminal remains undeveloped four years after it was abandoned for the new midfield terminal.

Several parcels of airport property remain undeveloped, including land near the entrance eyed for a gasoline station. Many of the airport’s aviation-related facilities remain vacant, including the air side of the U.S. Postal Service’s former Eagle Air hub.

The authority's efforts to squeeze more revenue from its property have drawn the ire of Decatur Township community leaders.

At the airport’s board meeting Friday, Decatur Township representative Pat Andrews asked the board to drop its lawsuit in Marion Superior Court aimed at stopping a private firm from building a parking facility south of the airport.

Cincinnati-based Chavez Properties won approval of the Metropolitan Development Commission last month to develop a 31-acre, 3,700-space lot at the AmeriPlex commercial development that would compete with the airport’s parking facilities.

Airport and city officials had protested the private lot, saying the AmeriPlex complex received city funding for infrastructure upgrades and that a parking lot there was not appropriate and could drain airport revenue.

Andrews told the board the airport’s battle against the private parking lot operator essentially was “un-American.”

She said the lot could provide hundreds of thousands of dollars of much-needed tax revenue to Decatur Township, which has relatively little in the way of retail and restaurants. The airport has been both a blessing and curse over the years to Decatur Township in that it is exempt from paying taxes to the township.

Airport officials thanked Andrews for her presentation but did not respond to her request to drop the lawsuit.


  • Obscene
    You have got to be kidding. This is obscene. Peter Drucker once said that one of the things that could undermine capitalism in this country is the spread between what executives make and what the average employee makes. If you want to help make this country better, things like this should not be allowed. I am sorry, it just isn't right. Employees get police escorts and executives get hundreds of thousands. Please stop this nonsense.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............