IBJNews

Ex-elections chief seeks relief for convictions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Court of Appeals has dismissed an appeal by ousted Secretary of State Charlie White so he can seek relief from the judge who presided over his vote fraud trial.

An order signed by Chief Appeals Court Judge Margret Robb and posted online Monday dismissed White's appeal so he can pursue post-conviction relief before Hamilton Superior Court Judge Steven Nation.

In a petition for post-conviction relief, a defendant asks the trial judge to correct errors that occurred during the trial, such as a violation of his constitutional rights. The judge, for example, might grant a new trial or impose a different sentence.

Nation presided over the trial in which White was convicted Feb. 4 of six felony counts, including using his ex-wife's address to vote and to keep his council seat in Fishers, north of Indianapolis. Indiana law bars convicted felons from holding office.

Attorney Bryan Ciyou filed a brief last week in appeals court, challenging White's convictions on charges of perjury on his marriage license application, submitting a false voter registration application and casting a fraudulent ballot.

The brief did not contest White's three other felony convictions for perjury, theft and voting in the wrong precinct.

Robb's order dismissed the appeal so that White can pursue post-conviction relief. If White isn't satisfied with Nation's ruling, he still can file an appeal — but only on the issues Ciyou raised in the dismissed appeal or any issues that might arise from the petition for post-conviction relief.

Ciyou declined comment Monday on the developments.

John Dowd, one of the special prosecutors in the case, said the state would be ready to contest the petition.

"We'll go to court and address his claims on the post-conviction (relief) whenever the court sets the hearing," Dowd said.

White, a Republican, said at the time of his conviction that the case ignored a complicated personal life in which he was trying to raise his 10-year-old son, plan a new marriage and campaign for statewide office in 2010. He said he stayed at his ex-wife's house when he wasn't campaigning and did not reside in the Fishers condo with his current wife, Michelle, until after he remarried.

However, Dowd and other prosecutors argued White listed his ex-wife's address on his voter registration form because he didn't want to give up his town council salary.

White's sentence of a year on home detention has been stayed while he appeals his convictions.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • shakes head
    Well I see he is at it again. White face it you got caught and now you have to pay for it. So in other words you are saying that he is trying to get the felon convict overturn so he can get his job back right
  • AP Has It Wrong
    This story is completely in error. White's attorney filed a Davis Petition, which the Court granted on September 7. The direct appeal has been dismissed while he pursues post-conviction relief, which starts back at the trial court level.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT