IBJNews

Ex-elections chief seeks relief for convictions

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals has dismissed an appeal by ousted Secretary of State Charlie White so he can seek relief from the judge who presided over his vote fraud trial.

An order signed by Chief Appeals Court Judge Margret Robb and posted online Monday dismissed White's appeal so he can pursue post-conviction relief before Hamilton Superior Court Judge Steven Nation.

In a petition for post-conviction relief, a defendant asks the trial judge to correct errors that occurred during the trial, such as a violation of his constitutional rights. The judge, for example, might grant a new trial or impose a different sentence.

Nation presided over the trial in which White was convicted Feb. 4 of six felony counts, including using his ex-wife's address to vote and to keep his council seat in Fishers, north of Indianapolis. Indiana law bars convicted felons from holding office.

Attorney Bryan Ciyou filed a brief last week in appeals court, challenging White's convictions on charges of perjury on his marriage license application, submitting a false voter registration application and casting a fraudulent ballot.

The brief did not contest White's three other felony convictions for perjury, theft and voting in the wrong precinct.

Robb's order dismissed the appeal so that White can pursue post-conviction relief. If White isn't satisfied with Nation's ruling, he still can file an appeal — but only on the issues Ciyou raised in the dismissed appeal or any issues that might arise from the petition for post-conviction relief.

Ciyou declined comment Monday on the developments.

John Dowd, one of the special prosecutors in the case, said the state would be ready to contest the petition.

"We'll go to court and address his claims on the post-conviction (relief) whenever the court sets the hearing," Dowd said.

White, a Republican, said at the time of his conviction that the case ignored a complicated personal life in which he was trying to raise his 10-year-old son, plan a new marriage and campaign for statewide office in 2010. He said he stayed at his ex-wife's house when he wasn't campaigning and did not reside in the Fishers condo with his current wife, Michelle, until after he remarried.

However, Dowd and other prosecutors argued White listed his ex-wife's address on his voter registration form because he didn't want to give up his town council salary.

White's sentence of a year on home detention has been stayed while he appeals his convictions.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • shakes head
    Well I see he is at it again. White face it you got caught and now you have to pay for it. So in other words you are saying that he is trying to get the felon convict overturn so he can get his job back right
  • AP Has It Wrong
    This story is completely in error. White's attorney filed a Davis Petition, which the Court granted on September 7. The direct appeal has been dismissed while he pursues post-conviction relief, which starts back at the trial court level.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT