ExactTarget mulls building downtown tower

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ExactTarget Inc. is evaluating downtown sites where it could build a headquarters tower as large as 500,000 square feet, real estate brokers familiar with the discussions told IBJ.

The move suggests the digital marketing company, which was acquired by Salesforce.com for $2.5 billion last year, is poised to continue rapidly ramping up its hometown presence.

exacttarget-factbox.gifExactTarget already employs about 1,000 people downtown spread across 215,000 square feet in three locations: the Guaranty Building on Monument Circle, the Century Building at Pennsylvania and Maryland streets, and the Gibson Building at Michigan Street and Capitol Avenue.

Constructing its own building could allow ExactTarget to consolidate offices, or to maintain existing outposts and accommodate continued growth. ExactTarget is searching now to fill 300 local job openings.

“We have no plans of moving out of those buildings,” said Todd Richardson, ExactTarget’s executive vice president of administration. “I can see down the road needing to pursue a fourth opportunity. Thankfully, there are options available in the downtown area.”

The three leases have expiration dates ranging from 2016 to 2021, according to a filing ExactTarget made with the Securities and Exchange Commission in early 2013.

Real estate brokers are abuzz about the potential for a new downtown tower, stirred up by recent queries about possible sites by ExactTarget’s outside broker, Jenna Barnett of Newmark Knight Frank Halakar.

Allen Allen

Barnett didn’t return phone calls seeking comment. Richardson downplayed Barnett’s inquiries, saying part of her job is to continually evaluate real estate options, whether or not the company is actively searching.

“Our effective strategy to date is to go breathe life in some older buildings,” he said. “Does it mean that we deviate from the strategy down the road? Time will tell.”

Parking lots available

Two available parking lots could be at the top of ExactTarget’s list, brokers said.

One, at the southwest corner of Maryland and Pennsylvania streets, was part of local developer J. Greg Allen’s plans for a mixed-use development called Penn Centre.

Allen had planned to build apartments and two hotels on the site, but his ambitions were scuttled by the financial crisis.

A few years earlier, Simon Property Group Inc. had mulled building a 300,000-square-foot headquarters there but opted instead for a site at Washington Street and Capitol Avenue.

The other parking lot spans the southern part of the former Market Square Arena site. The city, which owns the property, hopes construction of Flaherty & Collins’ $81 million apartment tower directly to the north helps spur a major project on the parcel.

Richardson Richardson

Allen, who still owns the property at Maryland and Pennsylvania streets, declined to comment on ExactTarget’s interest but said his site is best suited for an office tower.

“We think 300,000 to 400,000 square feet and above is necessary to utilize its full potential,” he said. “That’s what we’ve been waiting for, and we think our time is just about here. We’re feeling great about the market.”

Cummins Inc., which also is searching for a downtown site to construct an office building, had expressed interest in the Allen property but seems to be eyeing the MSA parcel.

The Columbus-based manufacturer of diesel engines has about 70 downtown workers spread across 30,000 square feet in OneAmerica Tower and Capital Center North.

Cummins wants to consolidate those offices into a new building before existing leases expire over the next two years. The building could be as large as 70,000 square feet.

But Cummins’ plans to vacate OneAmerica might have hit a snag. Its lease expires later this year, and Cummins is attempting to negotiate a short-term extension of two years to give the company enough time to construct the building. OneAmerica, though, wants to lock Cummins into a five-year commitment, brokers said.

If Cummins or ExactTarget builds on the MSA site, the office space likely would be part of a mixed-use project.

First-floor retail and apartments probably would make the most sense, brokers said. The city has made no secret of its desire to lure a large retailer such as Target downtown, and the parcel might represent its best hope.

The city is not in discussions with ExactTarget, said Deron Kintner, its deputy mayor for economic development. However, he said ExactTarget’s expansion plans suggest the acquisition by Salesforce.com is boding well for the company and the city.

Staying downtown key

ExactTarget CEO Scott Dorsey said when the acquisition was announced last June that combining with the world’s largest customer-relationship-management software company would accelerate ExactTarget’s expansion.

Staying downtown rather than moving to a suburban location likely is key to ExactTarget’s plans, said Sam Smith, chairman of Colliers International’s Indiana region.

“They’re big on culture and attracting that young, high-tech employee, and a lot of them might be renting downtown,” he said. “They want to be where the action is.”

Another location that might make sense for ExactTarget is Buckingham Cos.’ CityWay development at Delaware and South streets, brokers said.

Buckingham is seeking a corporate presence for the property. It attempted to lure the headquarters of trucking insurer Baldwin & Lyons Inc. from downtown’s Landmark Center, but the company last year opted instead for Carmel.•


  • Explore the Skyline Angle!
    Having lived and participated in urban design strategies for downtown Indy, I had personally researched potential building opportunities to influence and hence improve the Indianapolis skyline. I would love to share that with anyone who is interested. A brief is available on my website, the link is http://theskdesigner.com/project/graduate-projects/volumetric-analysis-of-indianapolis-skyline-indianapolis/
  • I agree, but not for same reasons
    I think expanding the downtown concentration of businesses and residential developments is key to achieving the true urban feel I desire as a downtowner, but there is oversaturation of vacant ground level retail already. It doesn't seem like Target has an interest in building, nor does anybody else have an interest in occupying the dozens of empty stores right now.
  • Saw it coming
    Given ET's growth plans, this is inevitable. They're not too far from filling the 3 buildings they're already in, so they'll need more space somewhere. Why not put everyone under the same roof?
  • Do It ASAP
    As a downtown resident, I fully commend and endorse this idea - if only to have that ground-level retail. We residents need a one-stop retailer like Target, and having one of Indiana's most regarded companies add to the skyline is a boon for all involved.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.