IBJNews

ExactTarget reports record quarterly revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ExactTarget reported on Thursday that increased global sales and an acquisition helped the Indianapolis-based e-mail marketing firm bring in record quarterly revenue.

First-quarter revenue climbed 37 percent, to $29 million, compared to the same period in 2009. That marks the 37th consecutive quarter of growth, co-founder and CEO Scott Dorsey said in a prepared statement.

“Our continued quarter-on-quarter growth is a solid reflection of our unsurpassed ability to provide marketers the technologies and expertise they need to compete and win in an ever-changing interactive marketing landscape,” he said.

ExactTarget increased its revenue last quarter by growing sales outside of North America by 150 percent, by acquiring enterprise Twitter platform CoTweet in early March, and by signing new clients and retaining existing ones, the company said.

Founded in 2008, San Francisco-based CoTweet is a Web-based business that helps companies manage multiple Twitter accounts. The company’s clients include Whole Foods, McDonald's, Microsoft Corp. and Ford Motor Co.

Also in the first quarter, the ExactTarget established a “social media lab” in San Francisco to spearhead social media product development and hired more than 70 employees, bringing its total headcount to more than 600.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I don't think it means what you think it means....
    ExactTarget is a SaaS company that has nothing to do with Target or Walmart.
  • Good!
    I much prefer to shop at Target than WalMart. I want it to do well. Compared to WalMart, it is always so clean and orderly-a pleasure to shop there.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

    ADVERTISEMENT